- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"Remember the 90's" people are actually making a case FOR firing
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:34 pm
Not the other way around.
The line, as we all know, is "if we get rid of caretaker Miles, we might not get a good hire and we'll go back to 90's level badness." I remember the 90's. I was there. The reason we sucked then is not because we hired a new coach who sucked, but because we KEPT a bad coach who sucked.
Mike Archer is the reason the 90's happened. Although he fared well for a while with what BA created, he couldn't recruit to save his life. His last year at LSU, the Tigers didn't have a player selected in the NFL draft for the first time in over 30 years. The school and fans should have recognized his lack of ability sooner. As a result, they were left with a talentless team which struggled to recruit because the avenues had all been left to decay.
Hallman, wasn't much better at recruiting, but he was better than Archer. Still, he had very little to work with and struggled to win. DiNardo was a much better recruiter, but his coaching ability left a lot to be desired.
It should be pretty obvious to almost anyone that Miles struggles in the coaching department. He's a great recruiter, but that doesn't mean much if it doesn't translate to success on the field. It's only a matter of time before recruits realize that they have no chance to win under him, and go elsewhere.
Bottom line, the 90's didn't happen because LSU fired their coach and got a bad one. The 90's happened because LSU DIDN'T fire a bad coach sooner, and it set the program back a decade. The firing-------> 90's people are dead wrong.
The line, as we all know, is "if we get rid of caretaker Miles, we might not get a good hire and we'll go back to 90's level badness." I remember the 90's. I was there. The reason we sucked then is not because we hired a new coach who sucked, but because we KEPT a bad coach who sucked.
Mike Archer is the reason the 90's happened. Although he fared well for a while with what BA created, he couldn't recruit to save his life. His last year at LSU, the Tigers didn't have a player selected in the NFL draft for the first time in over 30 years. The school and fans should have recognized his lack of ability sooner. As a result, they were left with a talentless team which struggled to recruit because the avenues had all been left to decay.
Hallman, wasn't much better at recruiting, but he was better than Archer. Still, he had very little to work with and struggled to win. DiNardo was a much better recruiter, but his coaching ability left a lot to be desired.
It should be pretty obvious to almost anyone that Miles struggles in the coaching department. He's a great recruiter, but that doesn't mean much if it doesn't translate to success on the field. It's only a matter of time before recruits realize that they have no chance to win under him, and go elsewhere.
Bottom line, the 90's didn't happen because LSU fired their coach and got a bad one. The 90's happened because LSU DIDN'T fire a bad coach sooner, and it set the program back a decade. The firing-------> 90's people are dead wrong.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:35 pm to blueboy
frick the 90's. The starting point and leverage are dramatically different. Anyone who cannot process this is completely dumb.
This post was edited on 12/14/15 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:37 pm to blueboy
It does not appear that infrastructure within the administration is in place to hire a championship winning coach. In any big sport at LSU.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:41 pm to blueboy
I was there too genius. Miles inherited a GOLDMINE in facilities and a national powerhouse reputation - MUCH Different that the 90's.... why can't you people see this ?!!
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:43 pm to blueboy
Been saying the same thing for a month now, keeping Miles will send us back to the 90's. Let's go out and at least try to avoid it with a good hire. The expectations have already fallen from "we compete for the West every year" to "we win 9-10 games and compete for the West every few years." Where are we at by the end of next season "as long as we win 8 and get to 10 every few years."
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:49 pm to blueboy
He was the head coach for four years and won a share of the SEC title his first year. How much sooner should "they" have known to fire him?
I agree he decimated the program, but his termination was handled swiftly.
I agree he decimated the program, but his termination was handled swiftly.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:51 pm to deathvalleyrox27
quote:
Miles inherited a GOLDMIN
See what Archer inherited and how fast things declined.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:59 pm to blueboy
quote:
Bottom line, the 90's didn't happen because LSU fired their coach and got a bad one. The 90's happened because LSU DIDN'T fire a bad coach sooner, and it set the program back a decade. The firing-------> 90's people are dead wrong.
You, my friend, are dead wrong. The 90's happened because of incompetent hires in he athletic department. First, they hired a 34 year old DC (realy ruined his promising career) instead of choosing from Steve Spurrier, Mike Shanahan, and Mack Brown who were all reportedly interviewed. That was done on the recommendation of the successful previous head coach who was leaving to take the Florida AD job, not sure why anyone would do that (he also subsequently hired Spurrier). Then, after 2 losing seasons they made the worst hire in LSU history, Hallman.
That is primarily how the dark period came about. There is a little more to it and it goes a little further back but that is the gist of it.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:59 pm to blueboy
i'm almost positive that we kept Archer 4 years; the term of his contract. that was the way teams did it in those days. at least teams with class. notre dame kept jerry faust for his contract also and the whole world knew he was in way over his head.
this, of course, killed recruiting.
the game of college football was not played JUST FOR MONEY in those days. not all HC's had agents and their salary's didn't top out over a million bucks.
comparing those days to today is not that valuable. the most valuable things to note is that LSU always went cheap on hiring a HC and that often turned out to be penny wise and dollar foolish. lastly, the fans are HOSED today as far as the cost of college football.
in summary, keeping archer and letting his contract run out should not be compared to keeping Miles. your effort to do so will only be rewarded by those that support your final goal and you don't need to use these cheap tactics to convince them of anything Miles related.
this, of course, killed recruiting.
the game of college football was not played JUST FOR MONEY in those days. not all HC's had agents and their salary's didn't top out over a million bucks.
comparing those days to today is not that valuable. the most valuable things to note is that LSU always went cheap on hiring a HC and that often turned out to be penny wise and dollar foolish. lastly, the fans are HOSED today as far as the cost of college football.
in summary, keeping archer and letting his contract run out should not be compared to keeping Miles. your effort to do so will only be rewarded by those that support your final goal and you don't need to use these cheap tactics to convince them of anything Miles related.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:00 pm to blueboy
quote:
Remember the 90's" people are actually making a case FOR firing
Well if they are, they're making the case at the wrong time. Miles is not going to be fired this year. Talking about it ad infinitum is just blowing wind
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:01 pm to The First Cut
quote:That team won the SEC on autopilot.
He was the head coach for four years and won a share of the SEC title his first year. How much sooner should "they" have known to fire him?
His second year was a sign of rapid decline, and his third year was a disaster. Keeping him another year after that was a terrible mistake.
The other point I was going to make was about the constant references to LSU's "bitchy fan base." It's the bitchy fan base that forced the good hires to begin with. If it wasn't for the fan pressure, we'd still be wallowing in mediocrity with "lovable" DiNardo.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:03 pm to The First Cut
90's, is that the time when there was no budget for coaching Staff's? Wasn't the 90's and before a time when the facilities at LSU were among the worst in the SEC? The 90's wasn't that at the time where there was little to no budget for recruiting? The 90's and before it was so bad we were busing the Football team to the practice fields!! Miles would not have recruited during this time as well as Hallman or Dinardo did!! 3 years top's Then fired
This post was edited on 12/14/15 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:11 pm to mdomingue
quote:And the subsequent failure to fire them when it was obvious that they were horrible. shite, Archer's 2nd year was a disaster. I'd have canned him after that comedy of errors.
The 90's happened because of incompetent hires in he athletic department.
quote:
First, they hired a 34 year old DC (realy ruined his promising career) instead of choosing from Steve Spurrier, Mike Shanahan, and Mack Brown
quote:
That was done on the recommendation of the successful previous head coach who was leaving to take the Florida AD job
quote:
not sure why anyone would do that
quote:
who was leaving to take the Florida AD job
quote:
(he also subsequently hired Spurrier)
quote:
not sure why anyone would do that
quote:
head coach who was leaving to take the Florida AD job
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:16 pm to blueboy
OP is sharing with us some of the worst logic so far.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 6:44 am
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:29 pm to 756
"Worst"
And the main point is that the "if we fire Miles, we might go back to the 90's" people are wrong.
And the main point is that the "if we fire Miles, we might go back to the 90's" people are wrong.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:35 pm to 756
Archer won the SEC in his second year, 1988, year of the Earthquake game. 1 SEC loss that year. His first season 1987 went 10-1-1 and finished in the top 5. His first recruiting class had 3 players that were drafted, Corey Raymond, Marc Boutte, and Todd Kinchen. Another, roger Hutchinson would have been a top 2 round pick, but he gave up football the year Archer got fired. Archers problem was based more on Attrition than recruiting. LSU would have been better off keeping that staff that included Pete Jenkins, jerry Sullivan and several other quality assistants versus trading out for Curley and his boys.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:37 pm to vjm41
Didn't stop Arnsberger from winning.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:40 pm to blueboy
You are wrong for a couple of reason, but the whole we will go back to the 90's if we fire Les is also a stupid argument. We had bad coaches in the 90's, but the reasons we sucked are deeper. We had bad coaches because we were not willing to pay for better ones. We may have been able to get Mack Brown instead of DiNardo, but Dean was looking on a budget and had to settle for guys like Sullivan and DiNardo. Rumor also had that Mike Gottfried was interested when we hired Hallman, not how he would have done, but he was more accomplished than Curley, who (though no one knew it at the time) was simply riding Brett Favre.
As for Letting Archer go sooner, this is just 20/20 hindsight. First off he was only here for 4 years. His first year, 1987 LSU went 10-1-1 and finished #5. That is the highest final ranking for LSU between 1961 when LSU finished #4 and 2003. Let that sink in for a minute. From 1962-2002, that's 40 years, 1987 was the highest LSU finished a season. His 2nd year LSU won the SEC, at the time it was the 7th SEC title for LSU. The team went 8-4, now people view that as an "unacceptable" record. But look at the OOC that year. We played 7 SEC games, there was no "rent a wins". Tulane was the closest to that, they were still the traditional state rival. The other 3 were Texas A&M, Ohio State and Miami. We lost the bowl to Syracuse who went undefeated and finished #4 they year before. The other losses were @Florida (with Emmitt Smith) @Ohio State (those were back to back BTW) and to Miami. The next year we went 4-7, the next year 5-6 and he was fired. So do tell Doc Brown, when we were supposed to fire Archer? Even if you thought he never should have been hired, you can not fire a guy with that record after just 1 bad season. Archer left systemic problems that were more apparent after the fact. Recruiting was not nearly as sophisticated as today where everyone knows if you have a great class or not.
FTR : I was all on board with moving Les out this year. If we don't at least make the SEC CG next year, i really hope he's gone. But what really sets programs back is not keeping coaches too long. It is making bad hires to replace ones that do leave or are fired and replacing coaches every 4-5 years.
As for Letting Archer go sooner, this is just 20/20 hindsight. First off he was only here for 4 years. His first year, 1987 LSU went 10-1-1 and finished #5. That is the highest final ranking for LSU between 1961 when LSU finished #4 and 2003. Let that sink in for a minute. From 1962-2002, that's 40 years, 1987 was the highest LSU finished a season. His 2nd year LSU won the SEC, at the time it was the 7th SEC title for LSU. The team went 8-4, now people view that as an "unacceptable" record. But look at the OOC that year. We played 7 SEC games, there was no "rent a wins". Tulane was the closest to that, they were still the traditional state rival. The other 3 were Texas A&M, Ohio State and Miami. We lost the bowl to Syracuse who went undefeated and finished #4 they year before. The other losses were @Florida (with Emmitt Smith) @Ohio State (those were back to back BTW) and to Miami. The next year we went 4-7, the next year 5-6 and he was fired. So do tell Doc Brown, when we were supposed to fire Archer? Even if you thought he never should have been hired, you can not fire a guy with that record after just 1 bad season. Archer left systemic problems that were more apparent after the fact. Recruiting was not nearly as sophisticated as today where everyone knows if you have a great class or not.
FTR : I was all on board with moving Les out this year. If we don't at least make the SEC CG next year, i really hope he's gone. But what really sets programs back is not keeping coaches too long. It is making bad hires to replace ones that do leave or are fired and replacing coaches every 4-5 years.
This post was edited on 12/14/15 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:40 pm to blueboy
At that time it was expected that a coach get 5 years to see if they could turn things around. LSU fired Archer in 4 years, that was aggressive for the day.
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:44 pm to blueboy
fricking go the frick away, you fricking incorrigible fricks.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News