- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Realistiger realistic assesment
Posted on 10/13/10 at 5:31 pm to Gray Tiger
Posted on 10/13/10 at 5:31 pm to Gray Tiger
There's a difference between a rational analysis and rationalizing. You've been in the latter category all season.
Most people are irrational when it comes to being a fan of football, and for the ones who aren't -- good for them. But for most of us, it's ok; it's just football.
Irrational sunshine pumping has never won a football team a game. It's debatable whether irrational bitching has given Lee an opportunity to win more games for us or not.
Most people are irrational when it comes to being a fan of football, and for the ones who aren't -- good for them. But for most of us, it's ok; it's just football.
Irrational sunshine pumping has never won a football team a game. It's debatable whether irrational bitching has given Lee an opportunity to win more games for us or not.
1
Posted on 10/13/10 at 5:36 pm to Bayou Sam
quote:
Irrational sunshine pumping has never won a football team a game. It's debatable whether irrational bitching has given Lee an opportunity to win more games for us or not.
Let's look at this logically.
Sunshine pumping is worthless, but irrational bitching is ?????????
Negativity is a better approach to any situation, is that correct?
Positivity is wasted, is that correct?
Think it through. Or not. Logic isn't a surplus item around here.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 5:40 pm to Gray Tiger
Do tell the logical reasons which support your belief that unbridled positivity translates into football victories.
All I said is that MAYBE irrational bitching led to more playing time for the better qb -- Lee.
All I said is that MAYBE irrational bitching led to more playing time for the better qb -- Lee.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 5:51 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:
yes I would like a fan vote on the starting job...
This is all we need. A team affecting vote from a silly person who thinks bump and run is a D-line alignment. (don't make me find that post)
99.9% of fans don't have a clue about major college football strategy, they just repeat what they hear.
There are cool sports polls you can vote in online and leave coaching to those the school pays to do it.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 6:11 pm to Bayou Sam
quote:
Do tell the logical reasons which support your belief that unbridled positivity translates into football victories.
All I said is that MAYBE irrational bitching led to more playing time for the better qb -- Lee.
Ok I'll flip the premise on you and see how you logic applies.
1.
quote:
Do tell the logical reasons which support your belief that unbridled negativity translates into football vic
2.
quote:
All I said is that MAYBE irrational bitching led to more playing time for the better qb -- Lee.
But unproven, right? You ask the positive side to prove something that you admit the negative side can't. Logical?
However, if you want to pit neagtivity vs positivity, which did the players on the team employ? Were they supportive or unsupportive of Les Miles? How did the people that actually play the game react to the negativity spewed here?
Were they negative or positive?
Posted on 10/13/10 at 6:24 pm to Gray Tiger
Logician of the Rant, I was expecting more. I made a tentative suggestion that negativity may have had positive results. Who knows -- maybe Miles would have played Lee more even if everyone had closed their eyes and held their noses and thought nothing but happy thoughts about Jefferson all season.
Your "argument" amounts to repeating "think" endlessly and declaring yourself logical. I'm not convinced, however.
Your "argument" amounts to repeating "think" endlessly and declaring yourself logical. I'm not convinced, however.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 6:38 pm to TigerFan55555
quote:Maybe Nebraska.
i think Nebraska is that good,
quote:GTFO.
Boise can beat anyone (yes, they play no competition but they are good for 1 or 2 big games a year.)
quote:Yes, and even poor teams have put some points on them.
Id like to see oregon go up against Bama, Florida or us...great offense but no one can matchup with there speed on offense in the Pac 10...in the sec it would be a different story...
Posted on 10/13/10 at 6:46 pm to Bayou Sam
quote:
Who knows -- maybe Miles would have played Lee more even if everyone had closed their eyes and held their noses and thought nothing but happy thoughts about Jefferson all season.
This presupposes that all the bitchin' and whinning actually made a difference. You need to prove that to someone other than yourselves. Before you award yourselves coaches of the year trophies, I'd like to see how the negativity caused positive results.
quote:
Your "argument" amounts to repeating "think" endlessly
Ok if that activity is painful to you, I'll quit requiring it.
I was just pointing out the absolute illogical thinking of negative fans. The Debbie Downers seem to believe that being negative is the answer, but they have yet to prove that it is.
They think that being positive is counter productive, but they have yet to prove it.
All they have is unfounded bar talk. If that is all you need, go with whatever works for you.
It beats critical thinking.
Posted on 10/13/10 at 7:00 pm to Gray Tiger
Humbly, claiming that you are critically thinking isn't the same thing as critically thinking.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News