Started By
Message

re: Please stop with all the crap about the Vikings late game

Posted on 1/25/10 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79155 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

What is the madonna headset please?




Posted by SeN-SaTioN
Pearland, TX
Member since May 2004
1157 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 1:49 pm to
Hahaha...that was a good one Egg
Posted by Common sence
Gilbert ,Az
Member since Nov 2009
1013 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 6:28 pm to
The Saints were lucky. They were out played all over the field. Worst i ever saw Drew play. Who Dat
Posted by ultratiger89
Houston, Tx
Member since Aug 2007
3040 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

try to knock the QB on his arse, try to strip the ball or int.


you think they don't try to do this? of course they do, they just haven't had the execution to do so, but to say they don't want or try to is stupid, of course they do.
Posted by Survivor 2010
Member since Dec 2007
2713 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 7:22 pm to
Bottom line, the Saints won. Period.

I hate that for Favrey and the Vikes but the Saints won. Don't turn the ball over.....you control that part.
Posted by ScootiniTiger
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2007
2522 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 8:13 pm to
I agree. I've said it all season long. LSU and Saints have the same defense....and I still don't like it, only the Saints have an offense.
Posted by fab4lsu
NC, SC and La.
Member since Dec 2007
895 posts
Posted on 1/25/10 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Favre
quote:

He has no business playing QB.


Really??
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16184 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 12:00 am to
quote:

They were out played all over the field.


Except for the whole part of, you know, scoring more points
Posted by lsutothetop
TigerDroppings Elite
Member since Jul 2008
11323 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 12:14 am to
quote:

The biggest thing I took away from the game is how the NFL is fixed and the referees decided that game in overtime. I've followed the saints my whole life, and now after Katrina they've been one of the best teams in the NFL. I call b.s.

I'm happy they won, but not so happy in 'how'.

WTF?

1) The officiating was heavily favoring the Vikings for most of the game - FOX showed a graphic right before Peterson's third TD where the penalties/yards were 2/10 Minny and 9/88 Sants.
2) If the game were fixed, then according to Yahoo! a Vikings fix would be better for ratings. LINK

But don't let facts get in the way of a good opinion!
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61926 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 7:16 am to
quote:

How do you throw an interception when you can easily run for the yardage you need?


FAIL

I know this thread is a day old, but I just read this. If Minnesota could have easily run for the yardage needed, then why was it 3rd and 10? I guess you're claiming that Farve could have scrambled for 6-7 yards? Please find me Brett Farve's rushing statistics. There were two Saints linebackers ready to pummel the 40+ year old man with a bad ankle and sore ribs from the pummeling he had taken all night. Even if Farve would have gotten six or seven yards from where he threw the ball, he was still 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage. So he only would have gained a couple of yards on the play. I know you're not going to pin your Super Bowl hopes on a 54 yard fg.
This post was edited on 1/26/10 at 7:19 am
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 8:08 am to
quote:

but to say they don't want
Les said "we had the want"......
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 8:38 am to
quote:

FAIL
FAIL

The play started on the NO 38. They need to get to the NO 35 to kick a 52 yard field goal, a distance which Longwell had been nailing in pregame. All Favre needs to do is pick up 3 yards, and they kick the winning field goal.


quote:

Even if Farve would have gotten six or seven yards from where he threw the ball, he was still 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage. So he only would have gained a couple of yards on the play.
MATH FAIL!!

(6 or 7) - 3 = 3 or 4; not 2

It looked to me like Favre could have gotten a lot more than 3 or 4 yards if he had run it; however, even you think he could have picked up the necessary yards.

Favre made a mistake. Childress made a mistake. Those mistakes cost the Vikings a chance to go to the Super Bowl.

My point is simple. People make mistakes. It doesn't mean they are incompetent or don't know what they are doing.

The Vikings mistakes were bigger than the LSU mistakes against Ole Miss. It doesn't mean that LSU has incompetent coaches or players. The LSU coaching staff made a mistake.

They also coached a team to an MNC.
Posted by CaseyMc2
Louisiana Native
Member since Feb 2009
4092 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 8:42 am to
quote:

I know this thread is a day old, but I just read this. If Minnesota could have easily run for the yardage needed, then why was it 3rd and 10? I guess you're claiming that Farve could have scrambled for 6-7 yards? Please find me Brett Farve's rushing statistics. There were two Saints linebackers ready to pummel the 40+ year old man with a bad ankle and sore ribs from the pummeling he had taken all night. Even if Farve would have gotten six or seven yards from where he threw the ball, he was still 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage. So he only would have gained a couple of yards on the play. I know you're not going to pin your Super Bowl hopes on a 54 yard fg.


Choupique19

You forgot one big mistake by the Coaching staff and that was before he threw the INT they had 12 men in the huddle penalty and that is why they had to run the play they did. Farve just did not need to throw back across the middle of the field, that is one of the first things that they are taught in the NFL before they take the field. All he had to do was run as far as he could and then go down and give it to the kicker. The worst that it could have cost them is exactly what they got, OVERTIME! Not an INT on Farves last play of the year or maybe as a PRO. Bad Move on His Part!
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61926 posts
Posted on 1/26/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

All he had to do was run as far as he could and then go down and give it to the kicker. The worst that it could have cost them is exactly what they got, OVERTIME! Not an INT on Farves last play of the year or maybe as a PRO. Bad Move on His Part!


So he runs as far as he could, which was going to be a couple of yards. His kicker must now make a FG in the range of 52-54 yards to send his team to the Super Bowl.

Or, Farve could have completed the pass to the New Orleans 22 yard line, and given the kicker a 40 yard shot at the game winner, the same distance that Hartley made for the Saints.

My point is that the big screw up was the 12 men in the huddle, which is not Farve's fault. After the two runs for no gain and the penalty, Farve was forced to try and make a play. That's what ya'll are understanding about Farve; what's the difference in a missed 55 yard FG to go to OT, or him throwing a pick while trying to give their kicker a legit shot? Farve isn't afraid to fail. He was playing to win.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram