Started By
Message

re: Passing Lee and Jefferson combined for 22-of-40 for 275 yards, 5 T

Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:46 am to
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:46 am to
What other Tolliver do we have?
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:50 am to
Lee was 7-of-22 for 105 yards against La Tech. It's not out of the realm of possibilities that Lee or both just sucked it up.
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Id be willing to bet it wasnt a whole lot...below %50


And what in reality based fact do you come to that conclusion? Or is that just based on your hopes and desires?
Posted by EauxK
Member since Aug 2010
354 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Not true. It was to Terrence Toliver, not Chris


I know. Just a typo. Chill.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:54 am to
Going 55% with 7 ypa and 5 TD are pretty good stats. I think it stretches the imagination to see how both could have "sucked" with those stats, at least in terms of getting the job done. Maybe the WRs bailed them out on bad throws or whatever, but the stats indicate a good passing game.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Just a typo.


Given how often this happens on this board, I doubt it. If you genuinely don't know the difference between the 2 receivers' last names, then just put a C. or a T. before it. It's not that hard people.
Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3945 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:01 am to
quote:

our defense sucks, keep that in mind


11th ranked in the nation is pass defense last year.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Going 55% with 7 ypa and 5 TD are pretty good stats


This.

55% completion percentage is pretty average and not terrible by any means.
Posted by EauxK
Member since Aug 2010
354 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Given how often this happens on this board, I doubt it. If you genuinely don't know the difference between the 2 receivers' last names, then just put a C. or a T. before it. It's not that hard people.



Being a Doc maybe you can prescribe yourself a tranquilizer.
Posted by bradwieser
Cornell Fan
Member since May 2008
10555 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:18 am to
55% is not a terrible %. Ryan Mallet was at %55.8 last year. And given the fact that they were practicing in the redzone and what not it makes that number look better. In 2007 the NFL the average red zone comp percentage was %56.
This post was edited on 8/20/10 at 10:21 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:20 am to
quote:

55% is not a terrible


Right. Just more evidence that average ranter hasn't a clue what he's talking about it.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1850 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:25 am to
Matt Flynn was ~56% for the season in 2007.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
67051 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:31 am to
ohhh gawd dammit.....

MATT FLYNN IS GONE
ZACH LEE IS GONE
PERRILLOUX IS GONE
JAMARCUS IS ON THE SIZZYRUP

ARE QB's ARE JJ AND JLEE.


.....they have to scrimmage against one of the more talented defenses in country and are facing one of the best if not the best secondary in the country.

5TD's? not bad

Posted by EauxK
Member since Aug 2010
354 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Matt Flynn was ~56% for the season in 2007


The question for me is who threw what and what situations. I can be happy with 55% but I am itching to know if we have one QB shining or both at about that 55%.
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10050 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:39 am to
quote:

55% is not a terrible %. Ryan Mallet was at %55.8 last year. And given the fact that they were practicing in the redzone and what not it makes that number look better. In 2007 the NFL the average red zone comp percentage was %56.


Exactly. Situational scrimmage where the numbers do not indicate anything without an inside look at what the team was working on. You can see 5 TD's and see positive, or see 55% and see negative. I think we know what most people choose to see out of it though.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Defensively, the Tigers forced a pair of turnovers


Who threw the second int?
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:47 am to
quote:

The question for me is who threw what and what situations. I can be happy with 55% but I am itching to know if we have one QB shining or both at about that 55%.


it's quite possible that JJ was more effective in moving the team, but JL had a better completion %...but that wouldn't show up in stats alone, thus the droning on about QB performance would ramp even more.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1850 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Who threw the second int?

Could've been a fumble.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Who threw the second int?


Since they reported one INT, it would lead one to believe that it was a fumble.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 8/20/10 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Defensively, the Tigers forced a pair of turnovers with safety Craig Loston and cornerback Ron Brooks each intercepting a pass.


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram