- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pass vs run
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:40 am to afatgreekcat
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:40 am to afatgreekcat
Quote: "The issue that we have is that we suck at passing, not that we don't pass enough."
I was not trying to point out we don't pass enough, but that of they 3 games we lost, 2 of them we had more pass plays vs rush plays.
If we suck at passing, maybe we shouldn't do it more than what we do well.
I was not trying to point out we don't pass enough, but that of they 3 games we lost, 2 of them we had more pass plays vs rush plays.
If we suck at passing, maybe we shouldn't do it more than what we do well.
0
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:44 am to foshizzle
Quote: "That particular factoid isn't all that important"
We lost 2 of the 3 games we called more passes than runs. The other game coulda been a "bad loss".
To me that's important.
We lost 2 of the 3 games we called more passes than runs. The other game coulda been a "bad loss".
To me that's important.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:48 am to LuzianaFootball
Quote:
"The problem is....., it's the fact that we pass when we need to run ...."
Another thing is our passing game is so basic and predictable just like everything else...."
"The problem is....., it's the fact that we pass when we need to run ...."
Another thing is our passing game is so basic and predictable just like everything else...."
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:54 am to LSUBS88
The better statistic would be run/pass percentage while the game was competitive. I think there were a couple of early season games where we did not throw much in the fourth quarter to run down the clock. Those can tarnish the analysis.
You also have to look at down and distance. I am sure we threw more on third and 10 than on third and 1.
I am looking forward to seeing these stats from you later.
You also have to look at down and distance. I am sure we threw more on third and 10 than on third and 1.
I am looking forward to seeing these stats from you later.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 10:55 am to ATLTiger
Quote:
" and 60/40 run pass this yr."
It was actually 56/43.
Those extra 20 passes vs runs in critical situations cost us atleast 1of our 3 losses, upon further investigation it may be more.
" and 60/40 run pass this yr."
It was actually 56/43.
Those extra 20 passes vs runs in critical situations cost us atleast 1of our 3 losses, upon further investigation it may be more.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:19 am to EvilVodka
Quote:
" I think they are scared to utilize Mettenberger, and it shows! "
Yet the only times they use him more, we lose 2 of 3
" I think they are scared to utilize Mettenberger, and it shows! "
Yet the only times they use him more, we lose 2 of 3
This post was edited on 1/16/13 at 11:20 am
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:21 am to ATLTiger
quote:
fwiw, we ended up at 200 passing/ 174 rushing, and 60/40 run pass this yr.
Shockingly, because we couldn't run the ball that well in November and December. WTF happened there?
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:26 am to LSUBS88
quote:
It was actually 56/43.
guess my math's off. or did you adjust for sacks? I didn't.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:27 am to PurpleAndGold86
Quote:
"so I don't think it is necessarily a good thing when we throw more than we run....
Maybe that was your point"
BINGO!!!!!!
"so I don't think it is necessarily a good thing when we throw more than we run....
Maybe that was your point"
BINGO!!!!!!
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:32 am to ATLTiger
Quote:
"guess my math's off. or did you adjust for sacks? I didn't."
Yes Sir, I did as stated 'plays called' and one of the issues with our "balance"
"guess my math's off. or did you adjust for sacks? I didn't."
Yes Sir, I did as stated 'plays called' and one of the issues with our "balance"
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:43 am to LSUBS88
Doesn't necessarily break down the number of plays, but it does make some good observations.
Article fron ATVS
Article fron ATVS
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:46 am to airbornetiger
Quote
"Doesn't necessarily break down the number of plays, but it does make some good observations.
Article fron ATVS"
Link won't open
"Doesn't necessarily break down the number of plays, but it does make some good observations.
Article fron ATVS"
Link won't open
Posted on 1/16/13 at 12:12 pm to PurpleAndGold86
There is no ideal percentage. If you're playing from behind you're going to be passing a lot. If you're in a shootout you're going to be passing a lot. If you're protecting a lead you're going to be running more.
Talking about "ideal ratios" is stupid and misses the main point which is which whether the plays themselves are designed well, and whether they are being called at appropriate times.
The offense needs to work. Pass, run, whatever, just put together an offense that can at least break the top 50 consistently and we will be in much better shape.
Talking about "ideal ratios" is stupid and misses the main point which is which whether the plays themselves are designed well, and whether they are being called at appropriate times.
The offense needs to work. Pass, run, whatever, just put together an offense that can at least break the top 50 consistently and we will be in much better shape.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News