Started By
Message

re: More about Roy King's dismissal - It was ALWAYS about the money

Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:12 am to
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103150 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:12 am to
They give scholarships for band???

Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68879 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:18 am to
Yes they do. Freshmen year, bunch of band guys on a free ride in Kirby.

I get it, you want to attract top quality students regardless of what degree they are going for.

But them, golden girls, tiger girls, etc. getting stipends is ridiculous.

Yeah they are part of all the pageantry and what not, but that's not what's selling TV deals and tickets.

Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:31 am to
quote:

all the bogus charges leveled at Roy King (an LSU alum and loyal employee for over 20 years) were just an excuse to get rid of him since he refused "play ball" and allow Tiger Band scholarship money be used for other purposes
hold on there chief. i have since found out that the s.o.m. did have a clause in the contract for the athletic dept allocation of funds for tiger band. so, they actually did have a say and roy was basically giving them the finger for years and they got tired of it. apparently, he was offering way more than he should have to some students and was offering some students to come back for a 5th and 6th year.

now, i do agree that some of the charges were trumped up but, there's certainly enough blame to go around.

quote:

the band's quality has gone down a bit in recent years
a lot of this is on roy. frankly, he's not a great director.

quote:

That problem will be greatly exacerbated in the future if this is allowed to stand, and you will definitely notice a difference in the quality of the band, if not this year, then very soon.
it's also my understanding that the 2 new directors are quite good, much better than roy so, this issue might be mitigated a bit and the band could actually get slightly better.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

The "Quality" or "Entertainment Value" of GBFTL half-time shows has little to do with who's on scholarship or how much the "Stipends/Service Awards" are. It's 100% on the Directors and the "Quality" of their Show Designs
not exactly. the reason why tiger band has been better than everyone else since before i got in the band is because lsu set the standard with the stipends. the money lured more music majors into the band and they therefore, play with a better sound than what other bands could "afford." so, the money absolutely makes a difference. other schools started following suit, coupled with roy not being great and the gap closes.

quote:

Myself and most Tiger Band Alums wouldn't mind seeing the entire Tiger Band Organization totally removed from any School of Music control and put under LSU Athletic Department control 100%
when i was in band, i thought this was the arrangement but, when i talked with my "sources," this has apparently changed.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:41 am to
quote:

that would be ridiculous if they are get stipend as well
it's like a job. if you're on scholarship and work at chimes, you get paid by chimes. same with tiger band. tiger band has nothing to do with any classes you're taking related to your major or any s.o.m. ensembles. remember, non music majors can audition for tiger band. they deserve to be compensated for their time.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

They give scholarships for band???
no. you get a scholarship for being a student, such as a music major. tiger band is like a job. it's not an ensemble like orchestra or wind ensemble or string quartet or your recital, etc.
Posted by Smalls
Southern California
Member since Jul 2009
10245 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

So the money that has gone to reward Tiger Band members (and attract quality musicians to the band) in the past will now be used to recruit students for the SOM. (Remember, this is athletic department money!)


OR, the athletic department can cut off the funding.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 12:23 pm to
Who cares that much about the band?
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99241 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 12:31 pm to
Sure it's about money, but now it's about money with a LATIN FLAIR!!!
Posted by Irish LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2014
2456 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

i have since found out that the s.o.m. did have a clause in the contract for the athletic dept allocation of funds for tiger band. so, they actually did have a say and roy was basically giving them the finger for years and they got tired of it. apparently, he was offering way more than he should have to some students and was offering some students to come back for a 5th and 6th year.


I'm not sure where you get your info.....but you are 100% wrong. There was no "contract" between the SOM and athletics for the Tiger Band budget. Based on my info (and reading the letter from LSU accusing Roy of completely false accusations), there very well may be a "contract" or "memo" already in place (or in the near future) removing all control of the Tiger Band budget from the Athletic Department. Thus, allowing the SOM to control the money. During Roy's time (and Frank Wickes), the Athletic Department had 100% control over the budget. In fact, the SOM never even knew how much the Tiger band received from Athletics.
Posted by Oizers
Member since Nov 2009
2646 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 12:47 pm to
It sounds like tiger band alumni need to put the their money where their mouth is instead of spending other people's money. If the band is that important and I agree that it is, they should be able to stand on their own.
This post was edited on 6/11/16 at 12:48 pm
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 1:03 pm to
You know that Roy had to get permission from Talley to play any and all music right? And that Talley had to approve anything the band did on the field right? Talley wouldn't let Roy change the shows.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

I agree with Talley. The band is "Under Worked." You can't produce entertaining shows if you only practice 4 days a week for an hour and a half. Has to be M-F for a minimum of 2 hours, plus the Saturday practice for "Cleaning."

Myself and most Tiger Band Alums wouldn't mind seeing the entire Tiger Band Organization totally removed from any School of Music control and put under LSU Athletic Department control 100%.

Put everybody on "Athletic Scholarships" just like all the athletic teams. Hire an experienced and talented Band Director, pay them a great salary, transition to all "Brass and Percussion" (Like Ohio State and other Marching Band's) increase practice time, recruit great high school marching band brass players/drummers and you're ready to go.

It would be just like any sport at LSU.

This can and should be done if you have the right Director and Staff in place. You'd have to hire a really talented and experienced Director (Just like the Football coach) and let him hire a great Staff. (Just like in Football) It WOULD work and there would be an immediate and noticible improvement in the quality of the half-time shows, because their only job would be to produce creative, imaginative and entertaining half-time shows that people would WANT to watch!.............


What you're describing is a drum corps. There are a couple of bands at smaller schools who lean in that direction (including Jacksonville State, which will now NOT be coming to Tiger Stadium this fall) but there is no Power 5 band that does what you're describing. College band is NOT drum corps. They are two different animals designed for two different purposes.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
So the money that has gone to reward Tiger Band members (and attract quality musicians to the band) in the past will now be used to recruit students for the SOM. (Remember, this is athletic department money!)



OR, the athletic department can cut off the funding.


Sounds logical, but the athletic department might well be told that they still have to provide the money, even though it will be controlled by the SOM. It wouldn't be the first time that the university has strong-armed to athletic department to contribute to other university functions.
This post was edited on 6/11/16 at 2:01 pm
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

They give scholarships for band???




For what it's worth, musicians are, after national merit scholars and athletes, the most highly recruited group of high school students. A good tuba player (for example) will often be offered a pretty hefty scholarship, even if he/she is not a music major, simply because a school's musical organizations need talented musicians. And a good musician who plans to major in music will be fought over by several different schools.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

You know that Roy had to get permission from Talley to play any and all music right? And that Talley had to approve anything the band did on the field right? Talley wouldn't let Roy change the shows.


This isn't true. Talley would have loved to have that kind of control, but he didn't. (As far as I know, the sum total of his marching band experience was serving as a grad assistant at Texas.) He might now, however.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24351 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Help me out here, band member get paid? I knew people get scholarships, but that would be ridiculous if they are get stipend as well.



We are talking a $1000 broke up in four payments during the fall semester. This to practice M-Th and Saturday mornings plus play the game. Being in the band is a labor of love not a money maker.
Posted by HeavyCore
Member since Sep 2012
2552 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:28 pm to
It's stated in the audit that it's true.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

It's stated in the audit that it's true.


I think the allegation was that this is the way it was supposed to work, but I know for a fact that is not how things have been done. I've known many other schools where the DOB is nominally in charge of the whole department but exercises little (if any) control over what the marching band does. Frank Wickes certainly was more hands on, but one of his titles was director of Tiger Band.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/11/16 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

There was no "contract" between the SOM and athletics for the Tiger Band budget.
i don't know if it was a literal, formal contract or just part of the process. either way, doesn't matter.

quote:

there very well may be a "contract" or "memo" already in place (or in the near future) removing all control of the Tiger Band budget from the Athletic Department
it is my understanding the s.o.m. has say over some of the money, not all. hence, the issue. if they had no say at all, they would have no authority to question roy. this was my contention until i was informed otherwise.

quote:

During Roy's time (and Frank Wickes), the Athletic Department had 100% control over the budget
when i was in band, this was what we thought as well. that appears to have changed at some point.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram