Started By
Message
locked post

Mettenberger is inexperienced but Stud's game plan ain't helping!

Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:29 am
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:29 am
Play calling is awful and they show no confidence.

Les almost plays not to lose rather tan attack
This post was edited on 9/23/12 at 7:31 am
Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10830 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:32 am to
The coaching brain trust is stuck in the 50's
Posted by TheUnderDog
My Boat
Member since Feb 2011
942 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:32 am to
"Studs" gameplan. rollseyes
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14724 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:33 am to
We attacked. Our receivers didn't come through. We could have close to 300 yards passing had they caught the ball.
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:33 am to
Les needs to allow a real OC coach this offense.
Posted by PeaRidgeWatash
Down by the docks of the city
Member since Dec 2004
15210 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:33 am to
Initially, we were on the attack. Then we kept imploding, so we went conservative. It's what won us that game last night. Quit being stupid.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60265 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:33 am to
quote:

We attacked. Our receivers didn't come through. We could have close to 300 yards passing had they caught the ball.

Exactly.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81262 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:34 am to
Stud lets Miles call all the plays and in exchange, Miles lets Stud start his bestie Josh D at left tackle. WIN WIN
Posted by The Future
Smallville, KS
Member since Oct 2009
22661 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:35 am to
quote:

"Studs" gameplan. rollseyes


I don't think they have a gameplan in all honesty. It seems like they just have a playbook up in the box they flip through until they hit a play they like and decide to run it.
Posted by tigerprl
DFW
Member since Dec 2010
1278 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:36 am to
receiver got to create separation on the route.
Auburn had them covered well. OL didn't give Mett time to find a seam. This didn't look like the same Auburn team i watched against ULM. I mean ULM put 40 on them.
Posted by brodrig
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2003
680 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Initially, we were on the attack. Then we kept imploding, so we went conservative. It's what won us that game last night.


agreed
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14724 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:39 am to
quote:

receiver got to create separation on the route. Auburn had them covered well. OL didn't give Mett time to find a seam. This didn't look like the same Auburn team i watched against ULM. I mean ULM put 40 on them.


I agree on all points. I said that about our receivers for last couple of games. They may be the weakest point on our team.
Posted by 41bengal
Da' Ville
Member since Jun 2009
2073 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:39 am to
last year it was if we had a qb that was the problem. this year we got a qb now the wrs can't hold on to the passes he throws. sometimes it's the players not the coaches that hurt a gameplan.
Posted by HeauxBeaux
Member since Mar 2008
5538 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:40 am to
Too many of you people bitch too much

We have a great quareterback, a great offensive line, and an above average receiving corps. Last night was an aberration as far as this season is concerned. Too many unexpected and unfortunate bounces went against us and we played tight.

Posted by trhoward
Mobile, AL
Member since Nov 2009
39 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:40 am to
Game plan was fine. Lack of execution is what was awful. If out recievers can catch the ball, we dont fumable on the 2 yard line and the o-line holds up their end ithis is over before halftime.
Posted by lsuohiofan
Alliance,Ohio
Member since Oct 2011
1503 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:40 am to
If plays like the throw back are in the book, why did it take to the 4th quarter to see it?
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81262 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:40 am to
quote:

Initially, we were on the attack. Then we kept imploding, so we went conservative. It's what won us that game last night. Quit being stupid.



running into 10 men box over and over is what won the game? lol
Posted by HeauxBeaux
Member since Mar 2008
5538 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:42 am to
quote:

If plays like the throw back are in the book, why did it take to the 4th quarter to see it?

Auburn didn't score the entire second half so why leave out the 3rd quarter?
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10533 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Initially, we were on the attack. Then we kept imploding, so we went conservative. It's what won us that game last night. Quit being stupid.


This!

Dropped passes, turnovers, and covered receivers kill a game plan.

Our fan base is moronic
Posted by Nodust
Member since Aug 2010
22631 posts
Posted on 9/23/12 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Initially, we were on the attack. Then we kept imploding, so we went conservative. It's what won us that game last night. Quit being stupid.


This
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram