- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marvin Austin Suspended Indefinitely
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:50 pm to bwallcubfan
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:50 pm to bwallcubfan
Its pretty much a lose lose for LSU in the media's eye. We win, we were suppose to because they weren't fielding their best players. We lose, its even more embarrassing for LSU because they were playing second string. No respect period.
It does matter because you need media respect to get in the NC game. But I imagine, really doesn't hurt the first game. If LSU takes care of business in the SEC, we'll get recognized. Its still annoying.
It does matter because you need media respect to get in the NC game. But I imagine, really doesn't hurt the first game. If LSU takes care of business in the SEC, we'll get recognized. Its still annoying.
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:50 pm to Tigercoop40
quote:
Butch Davis on ESPN, didn't mention Marvin Austin being suspended.
didnt say he was sitting on a bus either...... but he was
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:51 pm to deuce985
ESPN just reported it as well.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:51 pm to im4LSU
A win is a win. We are going to have enough challenges this year that if we are aiming for the top, then we will still have to earn it
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:51 pm to Beaux
quote:
Marvin Austin Suspended Indefinitely
So until 6:30 Saturday night?
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:52 pm to The Boat
quote:
So until 6:30 Saturday night
that would be epic
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:55 pm to deuce985
quote:
It does matter because you need media respect to get in the NC game. But I imagine, really doesn't hurt the first game. If LSU takes care of business in the SEC, we'll get recognized. Its still annoying.
If we just keep winning, they can't keep us out of the NC...so it's irrelevant
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:57 pm to deuce985
quote:
Its pretty much a lose lose for LSU in the media's eye. We win, we were suppose to because they weren't fielding their best players. We lose, its even more embarrassing for LSU because they were playing second string. No respect period.
It's a win/win...we win, hey we're 1-0...we lose, we get a new coaching staff
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:57 pm to deuce985
quote:
It does matter because you need media respect to get in the NC game
If LSU takes care of business and ends up with an SEC championship. They will play for the NC regardless of if they lose their first game or not.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 2:59 pm to Methuselah
Alabama won the BCSNC last season by beating Texas, who didn't have their best player (Colt McCoy). Did that deminish it in any way? I haven't heard anyone say it has. Things happen, many teams , win many games, with players, good players on the other team missing. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Icongeauxtigers.png)
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:00 pm to ZoTiger6
True, and we'll be missing two starters and two key subs.
Yet no one is talking about that.
Yet no one is talking about that.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:04 pm to MandevilleLSUTiger
Deangelo Peterson, Ryan Baker, Chris Toliver, and who else?
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:04 pm to beardedzeus
Ryan Baker and Karnell Hatcher.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:06 pm to Methuselah
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:08 pm to MandevilleLSUTiger
I did find a link confirming it. LINK.
Looks like Davis is trying to seperate it from the NCAA probe. Not sure if there is some reason behind that or not.
So, how does NC's loss of Austin compare with LSU's loss of Deangelo Peterson, Chris Tolliver, Baker and (maybe?) Downs in this game?
Looks like Davis is trying to seperate it from the NCAA probe. Not sure if there is some reason behind that or not.
So, how does NC's loss of Austin compare with LSU's loss of Deangelo Peterson, Chris Tolliver, Baker and (maybe?) Downs in this game?
Posted on 9/1/10 at 3:09 pm to Methuselah
Well for one, none of them are projected top 15 picks...
CT was going to see limited PT
Downs is in the two deep
Peterson hurts but we have some solid young receivers
Baker hurts but Chavis is one of the best LB coaches in CFB, IMO
Austin is a impact player, none of the above guys have come close to proving that. So, I'd say Austin is a bigger loss...
CT was going to see limited PT
Downs is in the two deep
Peterson hurts but we have some solid young receivers
Baker hurts but Chavis is one of the best LB coaches in CFB, IMO
Austin is a impact player, none of the above guys have come close to proving that. So, I'd say Austin is a bigger loss...
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 3:11 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)