- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU's Vaunted 2013 Schedule So Far
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:08 pm
All the teams we have played have a combined record of 28-27.
We have beaten two teams with winning records (8-6 combined record). And against teams with .500 records or better we are 2-2.
The Total combined record for the ENTIRE schedule of 2013: 43-34. Not exactly the earth shattering competition we talked about in the off season.
Compare to last year our SEC's opponents' combined record was 68-35 (with the OOC rent-a-wins 87-64). With the bowl game: 98-66
So how is the 2013 schedule harder again?
We have beaten two teams with winning records (8-6 combined record). And against teams with .500 records or better we are 2-2.
The Total combined record for the ENTIRE schedule of 2013: 43-34. Not exactly the earth shattering competition we talked about in the off season.
Compare to last year our SEC's opponents' combined record was 68-35 (with the OOC rent-a-wins 87-64). With the bowl game: 98-66
So how is the 2013 schedule harder again?
This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 11:11 pm
16
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:08 pm to theunknownknight
Cool
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:09 pm to theunknownknight
but Bama played Kentucky
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:10 pm to theunknownknight
Had to play in oxford
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:10 pm to theunknownknight
Starting out the year, given the rankings of opponents, it sure looked that way. Get it in the right context.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:10 pm to theunknownknight
You're right. We shouldn't be upset about having to play Georgia (who beat us) over Kentucky (who can't beat their meat).
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:11 pm to theunknownknight
Get what you are saying BUT
you think LSU's schedule was not altered to make it harder?
Please post your social security number on the deep web. Thanks
you think LSU's schedule was not altered to make it harder?
Please post your social security number on the deep web. Thanks
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:13 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
you think LSU's schedule was not altered to make it harder?
Who cares? Guess what...in the END "THEY" did us a favor and gave us a cream puff schedule...and we BLEW IT ANYWAY.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:14 pm to theunknownknight
Yeah... Yall's D has some serious holes.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:14 pm to theunknownknight
Still trying to figure out how playing Georgia is a cream puff schedule. I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:14 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
you think LSU's schedule was not altered to make it harder?
Ole Miss was going to be on the schedule either way. Tenn. is looking like a tougher game than UF at this point in the season
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:14 pm to theunknownknight
Apples and errrrranges brah. Just b/c those teams (including our own) shite the bed, doesn't make them any less formidable. Which is probably a good majority of why preseason rankings are useless....which I find rather ironic considering we aren't "supposed" to go by last years measuring stick for this season, but it's clearly the case with Alabama remaining #1.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:15 pm to theunknownknight
College football is nothing more than a stepping stone to the NFL. Once a team loses a game or 2, passion and pride are out the window. They don't care, I don't care
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:16 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
Still trying to figure out how playing Georgia is a cream puff schedule. I'll hang up and listen.
Are you talking about the Georgia team that almost lost to Tennessee and just lost to Vanderbilt? THAT GEORGIA??? I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:18 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Are you talking about the Georgia team that almost lost to Tennessee and just lost to Vanderbilt? THAT GEORGIA??? I'll hang up and listen.
no, not that Georgia. Anyone who has followed them knows that UGA earlier this season is a completely different UGA from now.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:18 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Are you talking about the Georgia team that almost lost to Tennessee and just lost to Vanderbilt? THAT GEORGIA??? I'll hang up and listen.
You do realize that since we played UGA they've lost something crazy like 6 starters on offense and 3 or so on defense?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:19 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Who cares? Guess what...in the END "THEY" did us a favor and gave us a cream puff schedule...and we BLEW IT ANYWAY.
Yes so UGA's players dropping like flies after we played them at almost full strength has nothing to do with their losses.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:19 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
You do realize that since we played UGA they've lost something crazy like 6 starters on offense and 3 or so on defense?
Yeah and they lost their BEST player at the beginning of the game against us...and we still lost.
Excuses excuses excuses.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:20 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Yeah and they lost their BEST player at the beginning of the game against us...and we still lost.
Excuses excuses excuses.
So add 8 more starters out.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 11:21 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Yeah and they lost their BEST player at the beginning of the game against us...and we still lost.
they've lost over 10 starters to injury this year.
They've lost their 2nd and 3rd string running back since the LSU game, 4 receivers, several starters on defense, etc.
If Hill goes down, LSU is still okay. Now imagine if Hill, Hilliard, and Blue all go down. Now imagine their white
This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 11:22 pm
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News