Started By
Message

re: LSU is a Top 10 Wonderlic Scoring School

Posted on 3/24/11 at 7:14 pm to
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Patrick Petersen did not understand a single word of that.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51907 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

ITS TSHIRT TIME


#WINNING
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Is Peterson within a standard deviation of what we would expect?? It seems, based on statistics, that the black guys scoring in the high 20s and 30s are more surprising than Peterson.


I do not know the SD for the Wonderlic? But based on the IQ conversion (which is an estimate), yes. An SD is 15. On avarega blacks score an 85 IQ. He was roughly 1/2 SD below that.

I am more surprised by the super low scores than higher scores even with that population, as those taking the wonderlic are a "somewhat skewed" population. By that, I mean it they are not representative of the general and overall population. Those talking the wonderlic attended college. So you are choosing from a groups who at least qualified for college. Yes, I know they are athletes. But thaey did qualify.
Posted by Hitchcock
Member since Oct 2008
2889 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

Patrick Petersen did not understand a single word of that.







Don't you have a Trent Johnson is the bestest corch in college basketball meeting to go to?

The other 6 Johnson fans gonna be pissed. Trent's bringing more pizza brah.

Posted by miketiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
1676 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:32 pm to
IQ tests are racist.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

IQ tests are racist.


some actually argue that. Even the block deign subtest where all one has to do is put blocks together to make designs.
This post was edited on 3/24/11 at 9:35 pm
Posted by tigers19LSU1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2009
393 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:39 pm to
You used research performed in 1994. IQ test were culturally biased and contained material, words, phrases, etc.. that were common in the white household. Not fair to other cultures and not acceptable to use in order to prove a point today.

Added: SES may be a better indication of IQ. Stronger correlation.
This post was edited on 3/24/11 at 9:49 pm
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
4918 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

some actually argue that. Even the block deign subtest where all one has to do is put blocks together to make designs.


And one post later, someone actually did make that argument. Even though they have developed new IQ tests in the past 20 years and blacks still score 1 std dev less than whites.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

You used research performed in 1994. IQ test were culturally biased and contained material, words, phrases, etc.. that were common in the white household. Not fair to other cultures and not acceptable to use in order to prove a point today.


Inaccurate. The data hold true in studies today, even on nonverbal IQ tests. Even on the block design subtest where all one has to do is put blocks together to make shapes. Same holds true in blacks raised by middle-class white families. You need to familiarize yourself with intelligence test such as the Wechsler Scales, Stanford-Binet and TONI (Test of Nonverbal Intelligence) and the research on them, as well as the specifics on racial differences.

Simply because on groups scores differently than another does not mean the measure is biased or unfair. There are racial differences in physical attributes, physical functioning, genes, medical diseases. Why is it so hard to believe that differences do not exists in the brain or in intellectual functioning.
Posted by tigers19LSU1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2009
393 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

And one post later, someone actually did make that argument. Even though they have developed new IQ tests in the past 20 years and blacks still score 1 std dev less than whites.


Across all SES's, YES. In the same SES, NO.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Added: SES may be a better indication of IQ. Stronger correlation.


Inaccurate. EVEN when SES is controlled for, the differences still exist. Yes, there is a correlation. But those are are more intelligent are more likely to have a higher social and economic status. Significant racial differences are found even in children as young as one Bayley Scales of Infant Development) and yes, even those raised in middle class white families.
Posted by cajun12
Houma, LA
Member since Sep 2004
2461 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:00 pm to
All PP needs to know how to do is sign his name on his paychecks. and count his money. With a score of 9, he may have to hire someone to count the money. He will be fine
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

he may have to hire someone to count the money
or sucker him into bad investments that leaves him broke like so many other former athletes and entertainers
Posted by tigers19LSU1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2009
393 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:02 pm to
You make a good point. From what I have studied, studies show that individuals in the same position(SES, two parent household, etc..) score in the same range.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Across all SES's, YES. In the same SES, NO.


Incorrect. You are unfamiliar with the abundance of research. SUre you find the detractors will point to a study or two. But the overwhelming majority of studies and even mete-analytic studies show otherwise. SOme studies disputing racial difference have not only been found to be flawed, but same outright faked.

The racial differences data is so overwhelming that is is accepted by the psychological and cognitive scientific community, both black and white. These are people with PhDs in cognitive sciences, not someone on Tiger Rant.
This post was edited on 3/24/11 at 10:04 pm
Posted by tigers19LSU1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2009
393 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Incorrect. You are unfamiliar with the abundance of research. SUre you find the detractors will point to a study or two. But the overwhelming majority of studies and even mete-analytic studies show otherwise. SOme studies disputing racial difference have not only been found to be flawed, but same outright faked.

The racial differences data is so overwhelming that is is accepted by the psychological and cognitive scientific community, both black and white. These are people with PhDs in cognitive sciences, not someone on Tiger Rant.


Dude, it's not that serious. I'm ill-informed. I read flawed studies and your information is correct because you say so.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 3/24/11 at 10:37 pm to
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10233 posts
Posted on 3/25/11 at 8:49 am to
frick Nick Saban you wear Crismon now buddy. I bet you do, I bet you have a picture by Saban's statue.
Posted by TigersRuleTheEarth
Laffy
Member since Jan 2007
28643 posts
Posted on 3/25/11 at 8:59 am to
I don't put much confidence on the Wonderlic. Guys like PP are so physically gifted that they could just blow off the Wonderlic. Nobody is gonna overlook a stud like that because of some test.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99013 posts
Posted on 3/25/11 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Patrick Petersen did not understand a single word of that.





But he was able to read his name and see you laughing below it. Prayers sent.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram