- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Bama the most unproven #1 team LSU has ever played?
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:46 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:46 am to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
well time to lay the house on Bama
Hate to see lose your house.
0
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:49 am to NorthshoreTiger76
Yes!
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:55 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Unproven #1 Team" is a bit if a dubious insult. This team, like every #1 team in recent memory, is pretty damned solid. And it's hard to call a program with Bama's 3-year track record and returning players "unproven".
bullshite.
The only other #1 team with a similar cupcake schedule was Bama last fricking year.
They're a great team playing schedules that are ridiculously easier than other SEC contenders. Fact/
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:57 am to tiger4178
quote:
TCU, Auburn, Georgia, and Florida. Two quite different resume's.
Those 4 teams are a combined 20-14. Take out Auburn and they are 12-13. Not exactly murderer's row.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 9:59 am to tiger4178
quote:
They're a great team playing schedules that are ridiculously easier than other SEC contenders. Fact/
There's more than one SEC contender?
And let's not forget that Alabama shutout a team that LSU lost to.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 10:00 am
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:03 am to tiger4178
Unproven??
They look to be as good as ever, to me.
Until someone beats them, it's all talk.
They look to be as good as ever, to me.
Until someone beats them, it's all talk.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:14 am to harry coleman beast
quote:
Those 4 teams are a combined 20-14. Take out Auburn and they are 12-13. Not exactly murderer's row
Injuries decimated two of those teams that were both projected as top-10 going into this season.
In comparison to who Bama has played thusfar, just about anybody's schedule looks tough.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:06 am to tiger4178
quote:
Injuries decimated two of those teams that were both projected as top-10 going into this season.
Injuries also decimated Ole Miss, but they still beat LSU. Alabama on the other hand shut out a full strength Ole Miss side.
Why is it you want to recognize the injuries of certain teams yet ignore the ones of another?
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:15 am to YStar
Good question.
But I doubt you get any legit responses.
But I doubt you get any legit responses.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:17 am to tiger4178
I wish I shared some optimism of some of you but in reality we would have to make some major changes to beat them. the biggest change is to play focused, balls to the wall, for 60 minutes or we will be behind the 8 ball before a cat can lick his arse!
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:20 am to YStar
quote:
Injuries also decimated Ole Miss, but they still beat LSU. Alabama on the other hand shut out a full strength Ole Miss side. Why is it you want to recognize the injuries of certain teams yet ignore the ones of another?
It's called the transitive function for a reason.
Using that inane logic, since Bama beat Ole Miss 25-0, and LSU lost to Ole Miss by 3, the projected finish should be Bama by 28...no?
Good luck with that...
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:24 am to bamabenny
quote:
Good question. But I doubt you get any legit responses.
You gumps seem to be hanging ya's hat on the comparison of Ole Miss games.
That's cool, only shows ya's ignorance.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:29 am to harry coleman beast
quote:
Those 4 teams are a combined 20-14. Take out Auburn and they are 12-13. Not exactly murderer's row.
Go add up the records of the teams BAMA has played.
The last four alone are 9-26.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:32 am to YStar
quote:
Injuries also decimated Ole Miss, but they still beat LSU. Alabama on the other hand shut out a full strength Ole Miss side.
Why is it you want to recognize the injuries of certain teams yet ignore the ones of another?
Guess that means Alabama is going to beat LSU because they lost to Ole Miss.
Because that's how football works
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:37 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Go add up the records of the teams BAMA has played. The last four alone are 9-26.
Don't overload their smallish brain power.
Most are still trying to figure out why Mom answers to Aunt, and vice versa.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:39 am to tiger4178
Florida in 97 and OSU in 2008 were less proven.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:40 am to tiger4178
quote:
Is Bama the most unproven #1 team LSU has ever played?
Alabama has 2 good wins (Ole Miss & ATM), which is 1 more than LSU. Keep in mind I only call Ole Miss a good team because they beat LSU
*edit, forgot about AU.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 11:43 am
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:40 am to dukke v
(no message)
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:33 pm to tiger4178
quote:
It's called the transitive function for a reason.
Using that inane logic, since Bama beat Ole Miss 25-0, and LSU lost to Ole Miss by 3, the projected finish should be Bama by 28...no?
Good luck with that...
It's called reading comprehension and you lack it.
No where in that post did I say Alabama would beat LSU or that the results of those two games would play in any sort of factor. I specifically used the Ole Miss game to highlight your shortsightedness where you use injuries as an excuse for why teams on your schedule have bad records yet ignore the fact a team decimated by injuries has beaten LSU.
You can't have one then ignore the other.
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:42 pm to The Mick
No way we lose to Bama. No way Period! 
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News