- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:14 am to LSU Patrick
no thanks
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:15 am to mt1
quote:
This thread and the posts in it illustrate the problem with JJ coming back onto the team.
We shouldn't let someone wrongfully accused of a felony back onto the team because our fans are retarded?
That hardly seems fair.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:15 am to MJM
quote:
yea i think that's how a lot of people would feel if he goes back to the QB rotation and the offense starts becoming stagnant like the last few years
I would lose alot of respect for LM if JJ even takes a snap...no matter what the score or situation. He let his team down and its over, thanks for coming.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:16 am to MJM
quote:
the last couple years of this qb debacle says otherwise
Miles' only mistake was not firing Crowton earlier. But supposedly that decision was taken out of his hands after 2009.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:16 am to Roaad
quote:
What If JJ IS PUT IN, just cuz, and we win? Will JJ be a hero?
no...but he will get more credit.
JL or JJ, it's LSU and we are expected to win.
it's human nature..if you win, it's what expected.
if you lose, it's bad.. not expected
fair or not, its reality.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:17 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
We shouldn't let someone wrongfully accused of a felony back onto the team because our fans are retarded?
That hardly seems fair.
While he wasn't charged with a felony, the guy was still charged in a violent crime.
Doesn't exactly speak well to university that a player was charged with a crime and re-instated on the same day.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:19 am to LandOwners
quote:
We shouldn't let someone wrongfully accused of a felony back onto the team because our fans are retarded?
he was not wrongfully accused.
He pleaded to a misdemeanor which was the way to help the kid out of a possible felony and for the DA to save face as well.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:20 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
But supposedly that decision was taken out of his hands after 2009.
How convenient
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:21 am to rbdallas
quote:
he was not wrongfully accused.
The felony didn't have enough evidence to proceed to trial. Legally speaking he shouldn't have been charged with it.
quote:
He pleaded to a misdemeanor
JJ hasn't pleaded to anything. quote:
which was the way to help the kid out of a possible felony and for the DA to save face as well.
The DA had nothing to do with the 12 people that found there wasn't evidence to support a felony charge.
This post was edited on 9/29/11 at 10:22 am
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:21 am to LandOwners
quote:
While he wasn't charged with a felony, the guy was still charged in a violent crime.
The guy has been indicted for simple battery which, if the BRPD had done their job, doesn't even require handcuffs. You get a fricking summons ticket.
A four game suspension for a simple battery charge (especially in this situation) is about three games too long.
quote:
Doesn't exactly speak well to university that a player was charged with a crime and re-instated on the same day.
Why? It's a minimal charge and a first offense.
Anyone looking at this reasonably sees that the only group that looks poor in this situation is the BRPD.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:24 am to rbdallas
quote:
"just because"
You have got to define that. Can't leave it so open that you can attribute that to any of Coach's decisions.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:24 am to rbdallas
quote:
he was not wrongfully accused.
Uh, yes he was.
quote:
He pleaded to a misdemeanor
You serious, Clark?
He didn't plead to shite.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:27 am to MJM
quote:
If JJ's play leads to a loss
IF IF IF!!!!!!
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:28 am to LadyRPTiger
quote:
he was not wrongfully accused.
quote:
Uh, yes he was.
not having enough evidence doesnt necessarily equal wrongfully accused
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:28 am to MJM
So what les was just supposed to get rid of lee and jj and start over? You are so smart.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:28 am to LandOwners
quote:
While he wasn't charged with a felony, the guy was still charged in a violent crime. Doesn't exactly speak well to university that a player was charged with a crime and re-instated on the same day.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:29 am to rbdallas
quote:
He pleaded to a misdemeanor
Is there a rule we can set up that disables the SUBMIT button when what you wrote indicates you don't know what the frick you're talking about?
Chicken...is that possible?
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:29 am to MJM
JJ can't even hand the ball off according to the rant. He would fumble it backwards 80 yards for a safety and then the stadium would immediately implode.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 10:30 am to MJM
quote:
not having enough evidence doesnt necessarily equal wrongfully accused
It's not that there wasn't enough to convict, there wasn't enough evidence to indict. There is a huge difference.
The Grand Jury basically said that there is not enough evidence in the case to charge Jefferson with 2nd degree battery.
Therefore, he was wrongfully charged.
This isn't brain surgery.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News