Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

I believe that Fournette would outgain Henry running behind the same line

Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:15 pm
Posted by DmitriKaramazov
Member since Nov 2015
4467 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:15 pm
With the same playcalling.

Maybe that makes me an unabashed homer, but so be it. It's true. Henry isn't a better running back, he just has a better team and a better game plan.
Posted by The 25 Jersey
Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2007
1345 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:16 pm to
No shite
Posted by southeasttiger113
Member since Aug 2011
2046 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:16 pm to
Leonard Fournette is so much more physically talented than Henry that it's not even funny. Anyone who says otherwise is mildly retarded
Posted by Brendoni
Oklahoma City, Ok
Member since Apr 2009
21282 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:16 pm to
no doubt, fournette is by far the better back.
Posted by MrSpock
Member since Sep 2015
4325 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:16 pm to
Henry has had 2 extra games versus Fournette at this point.
Posted by lsuguru15
Member since Aug 2008
380 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:17 pm to
It's easy to see, their rbs don't get hit until 3-4 yards downfield. Look at Kenyon (sp) drake he's a good back too but Their team can make any rb look decent
Posted by Capo
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2013
857 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:17 pm to
No doubt ... Fournette is better than Henry ... Henry is a poor mans Brandon Jacobs ... Big and fast ... Brandon more violent though
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36312 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:18 pm to
Cook >
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

no doubt, fournette is by far the better back.


better, yes, but not "by far"
Posted by LSUTigah4Life
Member since Feb 2013
169 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

With the same playcalling. Maybe that makes me an unabashed homer, but so be it. It's true. Henry isn't a better running back, he just has a better team and a better game plan.


I don't know why this is getting down voted. I think the OP is spot on. Fournette is the better back...more vision, speed, and elusiveness. Henry is on the better team.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
54476 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:18 pm to
Yep it is more about Alabama's scheme they get the defense guessing and that is something our coaches know nothing about. Throw it deep, don't use the TE, power I formation
Posted by lsuguru15
Member since Aug 2008
380 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:19 pm to
Cook reminds me of jamaal charles
Posted by NotRight37
Nashville, TN
Member since Jul 2014
5843 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:25 pm to
Yes, I believe LF is a better RB than Henry.
Posted by Brandincookem
Member since Sep 2014
1552 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:27 pm to
LF breaks Barrys record behind that line.


He'd have more yards now if LSU had a threat of a passing game, on bamas level would even be enough.
Posted by BK785
Member since Feb 2013
3179 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:30 pm to
Of course Fournette is better. Bama backs are hyped up so much because of all that NFL talent on that Oline. Watch what happens to Henry when he gets to the NFL.......Trent Richardson 2.0. On the other hand LSU backs produce in the NFL; Hill, Blue, Ware.....
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32488 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:33 pm to
Guice is better than both
Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3515 posts
Posted on 12/5/15 at 6:41 pm to
There is not a single NFL franchise that would take Henry over Fournette. LF7 is the best talent in NCAAF and

quote:

Anyone who says otherwise is mildly retarded
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram