Started By
Message

re: Herbie would take USC on a neutral field vs LSU

Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:22 pm to
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:22 pm to
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
6533 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

The USC Bandwagon got fueled up real good after that Oregon game. Now it's steady chugging down the road.


While LOSING to Stanford in OT the broadcast crew was already pimping them as next years #1. If I remember correctly they said: "If Barkley comes back for next season, you have to put them at pre-season #1 don't you think?"

The shite is already starting and just like Chokelahoma the media will prop them up already on top despite the product on the field.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20374 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:27 pm to
I have watched just about all of USCs games this season and they are no where near the class of LSU
UGA would crush them
Posted by BulkLogan1
Gonzales
Member since Jan 2009
1150 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:29 pm to
38-17 lsu
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
77346 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Completely disrespectful to LSU.

Was it disrespectful to Florida in 2006 when people thought LSU could beat them at the end of the year?
Posted by tkr1407
Nawfiest Laweezianna
Member since Aug 2011
3132 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:29 pm to
I still don't understand.. Why can we never get any credit from ANYONE on the media!?!? It is such bullshite that we have done more than any team in the history of college football, but nobody gives us a chance against shitty teams!! frick the college football media!!
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
5264 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:31 pm to
USC lost badly to an Arizona State team that was not any good. They also lost to Stanford, who I think is overrated. They barely beat an Oregon team that got a complete thrashing from LSU. There is absolutely nothing that USC has done that indicates that they are a better team than LSU.
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 8:33 pm
Posted by fanrun
Omaha, Ne
Member since Jan 2008
1277 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:33 pm to
Not suprised, I figured someone would try to undercut LSU with USC, that's why EsPn sucks.
Posted by 7thWardTiger
Richmond, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
24670 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:33 pm to
LSU vs USC would be one helluva game. Saying that USC could stand toe to toe with LSU isn't disrespectful. Thats a pretty damn good football team. Yes they got blew out by ASU, but ANYONE who paid attention to CFB knows that ASU was a damn good team to start the year before they were totally depleted by injuries.
Posted by Haughtonboy
kansas
Member since Nov 2011
1753 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:41 pm to
bwhahahahahahaha! ESPN, what a bunch of choads!
Posted by Lithium
Member since Dec 2004
61867 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:43 pm to
Herbie took Oregon vs LSU on a neutral field
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:43 pm to
i am so sick of people on here defending herbie. dude is a complete jackass at this point when it comes to LSU. yeah he has given some praise as he has to, but he of all people should be on the LSU bandwagon by now.. but he just won't do it. no matter HOW MANY TIMES they prove him wrong.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:44 pm to
btw LSU would destroy USC. yes destroy. this year. easily lock up their receivers, and absolutely shut down their running game.
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:44 pm to
quote:


yeah, 54th in total defense and 47th in scoring defense


dude, shut up. they played against some offensive juggernauts in the Pac 12 this year outside of Stanford and Oregon!!!!!111one
This post was edited on 12/14/11 at 8:45 pm
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Herbie took Oregon vs LSU on a neutral field


thread.

i wish they'd bring this up to this motherf*cker
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:45 pm to
USC has the athletes. So does Florida, Georgia, ohio state and OU and UO. It takes more then talent, I have watched several USC games this season and their talent is comparable to ours. But what you can't see with the "eye" test is chemistry and heart. These tigers have more of that then just about any tiger team I have ever seen. Besides that, our oline would bull rush their dline.

Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

LSU vs USC would be one helluva game. Saying that USC could stand toe to toe with LSU isn't disrespectful. Thats a pretty damn good football team. Yes they got blew out by ASU, but ANYONE who paid attention to CFB knows that ASU was a damn good team to start the year before they were totally depleted by injuries.


Any team that could be blown by anyone this year could not stand toe to toe with LSU this year.
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

USC lost badly to an Arizona State team that was not any good. They also lost to Stanford, who I think is overrated. They barely beat an Oregon team that got a complete thrashing from LSU. There is absolutely nothing that USC has done that indicates that they are a better team than LSU.


This is also true. And since every game matters (hahahaha), they wouldn't get to play us anyway, 2 loses
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

LSU vs USC would be one helluva game. Saying that USC could stand toe to toe with LSU isn't disrespectful. Thats a pretty damn good football team. Yes they got blew out by ASU, but ANYONE who paid attention to CFB knows that ASU was a damn good team to start the year before they were totally depleted by injuries.

Nobody expected jack shite out of USC this season, and we had a great year. It started out iffy. We squeaked out a wins over Minnesota and Utah at home before playing like crap at ASU.
The team, which is very young, continued to improve throughout the season. The defense got a LOT better, and it was nearly enough to knock off two top 10 teams, but one would have to do.
We would be very fortunate to beat LSU because of a lack of depth. We can't rotate in and out the same quality of players that LSU can.
What I find funny is that some LSU fans fail to recognize that Los Angeles is a HUGE media market, while Baton Rouge is small potatoes. SC has built in advantages that LSU doesn't. The one thing LSU has going for it over USC is that the Trojans are crippled by sanctions and LSU is rolling.
Still, if we can keep recruiting the best talent (albeit not in the numbers we'd like) SC will remain relevant through the tribulations we're currently enduring.
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12300 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

It would be much worse than the Arkansas game
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram