Started By
Message

Do the coaches just turn brain dead at the end of a game?

Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:15 pm
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4468 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:15 pm
We all know Les Miles' history at the end of games with clock management, play calling, and personnel.

Johnny Jones' lack of calling time outs at the end of a game is well documented. And yesterday's loss to Auburn was a complete coaching meltdown.

But is Paul Maneiri going to join the brain dead gang? Bottom of the 10th, runner on 2nd with no outs. One run wins it. Lead off hitter at the plate. Your ONLY play is sacrifice bunt the runner to third. But Maneiru elects Fraley to hit away instead. It worked itself out when the right fielder fell down while catching the ball on a shallow pop fly and zardon was able to advance to third. But that was pure blind luck.
Posted by Team Purple
Member since Feb 2009
1238 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:18 pm to
Then did not safety squeeze with Laird.
Posted by NOSTRODAMUS
Prairieville/Dutchtown
Member since Dec 2003
16211 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:20 pm to
I was chastised in the game thread for saying that. That would have been the right choice and game over. Just like fouling fatass bowers would have been game over. Lots of big money makers going brain dead at crunch time.

Eta: I left Les out because it was a given that he's just brain dead all the time.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 10:21 pm
Posted by tigersnipen
Member since Dec 2006
2085 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:20 pm to
Yes even the best of them do

Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25948 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:22 pm to
Even when it works, you idiots still bitch
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22157 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Then did not safety squeeze with Laird.



The third baseman was on the grass and likely looking for it. Laird has a much better chance at punching on through than getting the squeeze down. Besides, Zardon does not run well at all.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85067 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:23 pm to
It was kinda the wrong call. Yes it worked. But a guy at third with 1 out is better than a hit with him on second. Playing percentages.
Posted by GeismarGeauxer
Geismar
Member since Dec 2009
5176 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Zardon does not run well at all.


Why not pinch run a speedster with game in grasp???
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85067 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:26 pm to
Because if you don't score you're already in a bind because your pitcher is hitting
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22157 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

Why not pinch run a speedster with game in grasp???



Idk. I guess they could have went with Kramer.
Posted by 13
Member since Apr 2006
1387 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:26 pm to
It's possible that if the right fielder doesn't fall, (runner has to stay at second) Lairds hard hit ball becomes a short hop bullet that might get through.

It's always easy to second guess... CPM plays the percentages, most people just don't actually know them.
Always amusing
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4468 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

I was chastised in the game thread for saying that. That would have been the right choice and game over. Just like fouling fatass bowers would have been game over. Lots of big money makers going brain dead at crunch time. Eta: I left Les out because it was a given that he's just brain dead all the time.


Speaking of fouling Bowers, what is wrong with fouling a player in that situation before the ball is inbounded? Or even a player not handling the ball the first second the ball is inbounded?
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
61927 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:29 pm to
Sometimes coaches go brain dead after the 6th inning.

:I
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4468 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:29 pm to
This is not a second guess. It is not playing percentages. Sacrificing the runner to third is the ONLY play in that situation. You are not looking for the big inning. You only need one run.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85067 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:30 pm to
I know... I think it was the wrongs all
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39993 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:30 pm to
Fraley was nearly .500 with RISP. Kinda makes it not a bad choice.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22157 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

This is not a second guess. It is not playing percentages. Sacrificing the runner to third is the ONLY play in that situation. You are not looking for the big inning. You only need one run.



Fraley has actually looked like dog shite bunting this year. PM may have thought he had a better chance pulling a ground ball to the right side.
Posted by gumbeaux
Member since Jun 2004
4468 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Fraley has actually looked like dog shite bunting this year. PM may have thought he had a better chance pulling a ground ball to the right side.


Then pinch hit him with someone that can bunt.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20426 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Speaking of fouling Bowers, what is wrong with fouling a player in that situation before the ball is inbounded?
isn't that a 2 shots and the ball on intentional?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22157 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

isn't that a 2 shots and the ball on intentional?



Yes, it can be. That would have been the worst possible thing to do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram