Started By
Message
locked post

Difference between LeGarrette Blount and JJ

Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:56 am
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:56 am
Can someone please tell me the difference between Blount and JJ??? JJ allegedly kicked a man in the face while he was down; Blount snuck a man after a game. I applauded chip Kelly for his punishment even though it was Blount’s "SENIOR" year. You don't act like animals and this has to be taught. I think the same punishment should be handed to Jefferson if proven guilty. Suspend him for the season but allow him to practice on the scout team, and if he only gets in the final game of the year for a few snaps, then so be it!
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:57 am to
Jj didnt kick a guy on national television. Theres a difference.
Posted by The Future
Smallville, KS
Member since Oct 2009
22661 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:57 am to
Jesus mother of God make it frickin stop
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Jj didnt kick a guy on national television. Theres a difference.

the action man, the action
Posted by trex1230
Atlanta, GA
Member since Aug 2010
1318 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:58 am to
Are you kidding? The difference is that Blount DID hit the guy!

Posted by Tigerbait337
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2008
20535 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:58 am to
Blount wasn't suspended for the entire season, you fricking moron.

Quit starting threads, they get worse every time
Posted by JLSU20
Conroe Texas
Member since Jul 2004
2046 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 11:58 am to
I agree with your punishment however the difference is that Blunt punched a guy on national TV on the field basically.
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:02 pm to
ok so the street brawl is better than the field punch only because the field punch was on national tv? no way, the actions were the same. They both did harm to another individual, or at least it still has to be proven in JJ case, but that seems like it's starting to happen. Look, if he did this and thats what im saying, if he did this, the punishment needs to be the same

meant for tigerbait337 not jlsu
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 12:03 pm
Posted by mhasen1
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
1707 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:02 pm to
Blount snuck a guy while wearing a helmet. Jefferson allegedly whipped a guy who started the fight. It's kind of like he difference between Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43299 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:04 pm to
holy jesus.

Blount did it on national TV and JJ's scenario is late at night at a bar where nothing but shitty video that doesn't really prove much. Big difference.

eta

And if it can be proven that JJ did it or if legal action is taken against him, he deserves more than a suspension.
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Blount snuck a guy while wearing a helmet. Jefferson allegedly whipped a guy who started the fight. It's kind of like he difference between Pearl Harbor and Hiroshima
ok so its ok to kick a guy in the face that started a fight? wow

thats the new definition of leader huh
This post was edited on 8/25/11 at 12:06 pm
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14521 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:05 pm to
You moron, one was on national television for the whole world to see. The other is wildly uncertain. If, and when, the same action actually does come to light, then the punishment will probably be the same.

But unlike LB's incident, this one is still uncertain.
Posted by pdxlsufan
Beaverton, Oregon
Member since May 2008
3226 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Can someone please tell me the difference between Blount and JJ???




Posted by keeerrrttt1
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Aug 2011
36 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:06 pm to
Blount was suspended indefinitely, and for a long time wasn't permitted to practice. He slowly earned his way back on the team with the practice squad and eventually up the depth chart by meeting the criteria coach Kelly set for him. His first carries came in the 2nd half of the final regular season game vs. Oregon State, and he played in the Rose Bowl that year vs. Ohio State.

Blount took one for the team, because there had been a string of bad incidents that had made it into the media, Coach Kelly came down hard on Blount as a warning to the rest of the team that he meant business.

Most people also don't know the full story...
The bad blood with BSU started in 2008 with a series of very cheap headshots that knocked players out for Oregon and led to BSU ejections, that led into the 09 rematch and events that transpired. Everyone saw the punch, what you didn't see was it being replayed on the big screen at the stadium on a 3 second loop about 50 times nearly inciting a riot, and as Blount was being taken off the field he was struck by a BSU fan causing his reaction, the camera angle at the time was directly behind Blount so it didn't show it very well how he was attacked by BSU fans and retaliated, spurned on by the BSU video staff trying to incite a riot by replaying the footage over and over.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36695 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:07 pm to
Proof
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44567 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

ok so its ok to kick a guy in the face that started a fight?


depends. if he's defenseless on the ground, no.

if he's still locked up in man to man combat, then by all means go Liam Neeson in Taken on that arse!

Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

If, and when, the same action actually does come to light, then the punishment will probably be the same.

But unlike LB's incident, this one is still uncertain.

I agree with this, but I am soley talking about the action in itself, not the fact that it was on national tv, the action
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14521 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Everyone saw the punch
And herein lies the difference in the incidents
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14521 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

I agree with this, but I am soley talking about the action in itself, not the fact that it was on national tv, the action
I get that, but no one knows for sure if the action actually occurred (because there was no tv). Once proof is established, then the actions will be treated the same.

But at this point, no one knows if the actions were the same, so of course they will be treated differently right now. This isn't rocket science.
Posted by Patch
Westlake, TX
Member since Jan 2010
2654 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

depends. if he's defenseless on the ground, no.

if he's still locked up in man to man combat, then by all means go Liam Neeson in Taken on that arse!
Well it sounds as if no one helped him except for the marine so he might have been defenseless
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram