- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
By getting rid of miles, lsu could have made more money
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:31 pm
The bigger the bowl games,the bigger amount of money the university receives. As long as miles is coaching we will be in lower tier bowls. They should have bought him out and it would pay for itself in the near future
This post was edited on 12/6/15 at 5:32 pm
12
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:31 pm to CatsGoneWild
Nah, bigger bowl games and money are for bandwagon fans. Get with the program les 4 life
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:32 pm to CatsGoneWild
The money goes to the conference to be split amongst the members.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:33 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:what were your thoughts around the 2008-2009 seasons? Same?
The bigger the bowl games,the bigger amount of money the university receives. As long as miles is coaching we will be in lower tier bowls. They should have bought him out and it would
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:34 pm to CatsGoneWild
Original thread topic
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:35 pm to CatsGoneWild
All bowl and TV monies are split evenly among the SEC
Well I checked
Looks like each school does keep it's bowl money
Well I checked
Looks like each school does keep it's bowl money
This post was edited on 12/6/15 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:35 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:Some of you people have Miles Derangement Syndrome. This isn't accurate at all in the SEC.
The bigger the bowl games,the bigger amount of money the university receives.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:38 pm to CatsGoneWild
I made this same argument a few days ago.
Many people complained about Saban's salary when Bama hired him, but the university has been paid back many times over. Short term pain for long term gain. Great
leaders understand this concept.
Our president apparently does not.
Many people complained about Saban's salary when Bama hired him, but the university has been paid back many times over. Short term pain for long term gain. Great
leaders understand this concept.
Our president apparently does not.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:38 pm to CatsGoneWild
Dat peach bowl bid for fsu is dreamy
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:40 pm to Coater
The Peach Bowl is a NY6 game. I don't understand why people can't figure this out.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:42 pm to TheFlyingDrogbas
Our fan base would scoff at a peach bowl bid. It's what we do. Anything outside of playoff is failure
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:42 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
I made this same argument a few days ago.
Many people complained about Saban's salary when Bama hired him, but the university has been paid back many times over. Short term pain for long term gain. Great
leaders understand this concept.
Our president apparently does not.
Well that's true if the coach they bring in is as good as Sabn. Is that argument you're making?
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:42 pm to atltiger6487
quote:Link? I honestly don't recall anyone saying he was overpaid.
Many people complained about Saban's salary when Bama hired him
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:45 pm to Politiceaux
quote:
quote: Many people complained about Saban's salary when Bama hired him Link?
I honestly don't recall anyone saying he was overpaid.
Then you weren't paying attention. Many people were complaining.
They're not complaining now.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:49 pm to CatsGoneWild
In actuality the bowl pot is split evenly with all sec teams after team expenses.
The bowl pay out only matters to independent teams.
30 million is a big hit to absorb. Bowl payouts won't cover that!
The bowl pay out only matters to independent teams.
30 million is a big hit to absorb. Bowl payouts won't cover that!
This post was edited on 12/6/15 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:50 pm to longwayfromLA
quote:
Well that's true if the coach they bring in is as good as Sabn. Is that argument you're making?
No, merely trying to point out that paying a big chunk of money now can pay off later.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:53 pm to atltiger6487
quote:
No, merely trying to point out that paying a big chunk of money now can pay off later.
Yeah, but it can go the other way too, right? I mean isn't that precisely what Texas thought? How much bowl money are they bringing in? Same for Tennessee with Fulmer. Same for Michigan with Carr, and on and on.
I guess I'm trying to point out that most of the time programs make the move you're suggesting, it immediately tanks the program.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 5:59 pm to macatak911
quote:
The money goes to the conference to be split amongst the members
It's hard to believe there are people who still do not get this.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 6:03 pm to CatsGoneWild
"The bigger the bowl games,the bigger amount of money the university receives."
This is not necessarily true. For example, last years Orange Bowl Payout was bigger than the CFP games due to the nature of its contract. This year, the Rose and Sugar bowls will have larger payouts than the CFP games due to the same reason. Im sure this will change in the future. Also, teams within each conference share most of the revenue made in bowl games. However, there are sometimes "bonuses" given to teams who make bowl games with larger layouts.
This is not necessarily true. For example, last years Orange Bowl Payout was bigger than the CFP games due to the nature of its contract. This year, the Rose and Sugar bowls will have larger payouts than the CFP games due to the same reason. Im sure this will change in the future. Also, teams within each conference share most of the revenue made in bowl games. However, there are sometimes "bonuses" given to teams who make bowl games with larger layouts.
Posted on 12/6/15 at 6:09 pm to CatsGoneWild
It wasn't about money being available, it was about perception of money being spent. Alexander didn't care about how money was being spent, he didn't want the public or the legislature that he has been poor mouthing, to perceive that the University was spending money.
Yes, there are certainly direct and indirect advantages to playing in elite games, such merchandise sales, a 3 hour commercial on national TV. Plus, it a lot easier to raise money (both on the athletic and academic side) when you have success.
Yes, there are certainly direct and indirect advantages to playing in elite games, such merchandise sales, a 3 hour commercial on national TV. Plus, it a lot easier to raise money (both on the athletic and academic side) when you have success.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News