- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Besides the cheating, what really bugs me about the PP call
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:46 pm to XbengalTiger
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:46 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:Become acquainted with the rule book, por favor.
Well, it's obvious you don't know what possession is... In a "hands" catch, possession is instant because control is instant.
1
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:46 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
No. In the popular picture people like to show, he doesn't have his right foot down.
He had possession when his left foot was down...ball was in his hands...and in control.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:47 pm to jlc05
You can't determine possession from a still shot. Watch the video; he doesn't have it.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:48 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
You can't determine possession from a still shot. Watch the video; he doesn't have it.
i've seen multiple vids...he had it.
Besides...as I've stated before...most of the country believes it was a pick. You are definitely in the minority here. Good luck on your crusade.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:53 pm to jlc05
Just because majority believes something doesn't mean it is right.
He may have had an INT, but under the constraints of the rules and the process of replay there was not enough evidence to overturn the play. LSU fans refuse to believe this and cling to stupid conspiracies rather than embrace the truth.
It was a close play... had it been ruled an INT, it would not have been overturned.
He may have had an INT, but under the constraints of the rules and the process of replay there was not enough evidence to overturn the play. LSU fans refuse to believe this and cling to stupid conspiracies rather than embrace the truth.
It was a close play... had it been ruled an INT, it would not have been overturned.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:57 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
It was a close play... had it been ruled an INT, it would not have been overturned.
That we can agree on. Though I don't think it was that close...I clearly saw his left foot in the field of play while he had control of the ball in his hands.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:58 pm to Charles Bronson
According to What really happens in the SEC replay booth, they also had these two views of the play:
quote:
The replay official has access to every shot the TV network provides.
This post was edited on 11/14/09 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 11/14/09 at 3:58 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:Keep talking out of your arse. I don't need to see the rule book for a game that I played for 18 years. Do you know the difference between a hands catch and a body catch in terms of when control is established? Guess not.
Become acquainted with the rule book, por favor.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:00 pm to Ace Ventura
Those two views just show he had his left foot down. Continue them and show his right foot being inconclusive.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:00 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
Keep talking out of your arse. I don't need to see the rule book for a game that I played for 18 years. Do you know the difference between a hands catch and a body catch in terms of when control is established? Guess not.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:01 pm to Charles Bronson
Penn is a closet GUMP. Lets see what his excuse is after the sec cg.
penn is a closet gump. Let see what his excuse
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:02 pm to Charles Bronson
He had clear control when his left foot was down. THEN, when his right foot was in the field of play I saw a piece of GREEN turf come up.
Done, it was a pick.
Done, it was a pick.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:04 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
Well, it's obvious you don't know what possession is... In a "hands" catch, possession is instant because control is instant.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:09 pm to jlc05
quote:
I saw a piece of GREEN turf come up.
Doesn't mean his entire foot landed in bounds. It's obvious most of his right foot landed in bounds, but we don't know for sure his entire foot made is inbounds.
Ergo, INCONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:14 pm to Charles Bronson
Doesn't matter...he had possession when the left foot was down...in bounds.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:15 pm to arrakis
So tell me, in a hands catch that is not bobbled or double caught, when is possession established?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:18 pm to XbengalTiger
He would have had possession had he not tried to tuck the ball. Tucking the ball caused him to gain possession after his left foot came off the ground.
That's IMO and obviously the opinion of the replay officials.
That's IMO and obviously the opinion of the replay officials.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:19 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
It's obvious most of his right foot landed in bounds,but we don't know for sure his entire foot made is inbounds.
Really??Which part of his right foot is out in this pic?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:22 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
He would have had possession had he not tried to tuck the ball. Tucking the ball caused him to gain possession after his left foot came off the ground.
Oh my...
Posted on 11/14/09 at 4:28 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:Did the replay official have access to that video?
Really??Which part of his right foot is out in this pic?
Do you have an online link to that video?
That is the best possible view, and could be conclusive, but it doesn't mean shite if they didn't have access to it.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News