Started By
Message

re: Another Look at the Game Winning Shot (In Pictures)

Posted on 3/8/15 at 11:18 am to
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35382 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 11:18 am to
quote:

If Arkansas doesn't account for TQ, he curls that down the lane. If a defender picks him up then he stays spaced on the 3 point line to try and open the lane for Gray and short corners for the shooters
There wouldn't have been enough time for a drive by TQ, just a long 3 point shot, which we have seen at times this year. And Gray's man would have likely picked him up after the pass. But hey, you need a little luck at the end of games.
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2229 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Gray waited WAY too long to initiate. We should get a shot up with 5 seconds left to give us a chance at the put back. That didn't happen.

No, tie game on the road you want one shot to win the game with worst case being OT. Shooting with 5 secs left gives Ark a shot to get off a game winner. Maybe Gray should have started his move 1 second earlier at most, but thats even pushing it.

quote:

Gray got very lucky finding Hornsby in the corner. Gray jumped and then you saw him hang in the air a split second looking for who to pass to. He found Hornsby.


This was part of the play design setup to have two shooters in the corners. I guarantee you that was the exact spot Hornsby was supposed to be in after Gray's move. Gray probably shouldn't have left his feet, but in the end he made the right decision and a good pass.

quote:


Hornsby bailed us out, but I thought the last play was poorly executed.

No, again I guarantee you Hornsby shooting that shot from that spot was an option on the play.
Posted by GeauxToBed
Covington, LA
Member since Mar 2015
6113 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:12 pm to
Does he (Qualls) want recognition for hitting the game-winning shot?
This post was edited on 3/8/15 at 12:26 pm
Posted by Dirty Pierre
West Chimes St
Member since Sep 2011
745 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:32 pm to
Anyone got the gif of Martin's block?
Big time play, also!
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136798 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:42 pm to
RA'D


















for sticky
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14483 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Does he (Qualls) want recognition for hitting the game-winning shot?


Sounds like it. Probably grazed it with a fingernail and it had no effect on the ball flight. But, if it makes him feel better.
Posted by Jack Burton
Little China
Member since Jun 2008
2871 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

 I guarantee you Hornsby shooting that shot from that spot was an option on the play. 


Agreed. They have run plays specifically designed for Hornsby to shoot from the corner. I can remember the game at WVU where we needed a 3 to tie and it was a similar spot. They've also set him up for that corner shot on set plays before half-time buzzer. I think he likes that look. Not to say he was the primary option, but TQ clearing that corner was definitely part of the design.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Agreed. They have run plays specifically designed for Hornsby to shoot from the corner. I can remember the game at WVU where we needed a 3 to tie and it was a similar spot. They've also set him up for that corner shot on set plays before half-time buzzer. I think he likes that look. Not to say he was the primary option, but TQ clearing that corner was definitely part of the design.


Yep. In situations like yesterday where you need to run time off and get a last second shot, you aren't running a play from Hoosiers. You want some form of iso with shooters in positions to make shots.

The last shot should depend on where the help defense comes, if it comes.

Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39893 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:16 pm to
Question:

While I get what you are saying with this setup, the numbers say our best 3pt shooter is around 40% from 3pt range.

We only need 1 point for a win.

Why does Martin not break to the goal after the initial pic and get a standard roll pass and drive the lane on the defenders leaving Patterson and Hornsby?

Turn a 40% win chance into about an 85% win chance with a layup, slam, short 5 footer or getting fouled as the possible outcomes.

Not good coaching at all if the scenario you describe was actually drawn up as the designated play. Who chooses a 40% chance over an 85% chance?

Pic: Martin should be breaking for the goal here rather than moving out to 3pt territory.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14483 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Martin should be breaking for the goal here rather than moving out to 3pt territory.


I was thinking the same thing Meaux. Martin rolling to the goal IMHO, better option than having him pop behind the line. And he had been making very tough shots heading goalward all day.

Either way Hornsby and Patterson still both probably just as open.

But hey, it worked out.

Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164088 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:30 pm to
Martin picks up a charge if he does that.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14483 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:32 pm to
Valid point, we were getting none of the block/charge calls yesterday, at least 2 of which should have been no-brainers in our favor.

But he made 4 or 5 nice buckets heading to the rim yesterday.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39893 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Martin picks up a charge if he does that.


Ok, so drop the % from 85% down to 60%.

Do you still take a 40% chance at a game-winner over a 60% chance?
Posted by FamousAmos
Member since Feb 2010
3276 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 2:47 pm to
I think (without having the foresight to know exactly what would play out) they wanted no excuse for Portis to be anywhere around the rim incase he didn't switch off the screen....and IF he did switch and Hornsby and Patterson are no longer options, they would have a 3rd option from three in Martin.

This post was edited on 3/8/15 at 2:48 pm
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2229 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Why does Martin not break to the goal after the initial pic and get a standard roll pass and drive the lane on the defenders leaving Patterson and Hornsby?

Turn a 40% win chance into about an 85% win chance with a layup, slam, short 5 footer or getting fouled as the possible outcomes.
Short answer, the pass after the trap is a really, really, hard pass. Gray's pass to Hornsby wasn't easy but he did have a passing lane. If Martin rolls hard to the rim there is no passing lane plus you have help defenders one step away. That is the type of pass good defenses dare you throw after a pick and roll trap. Also the catch on a pick and roll (as opposed to a pick and slip and pick and pop) almost never results in an immediate good shot. The best shots are created out of the first and second passes out of the roll to catch the defense trying to switch and recover, which takes more than 1 second. To run a pick and roll action they would have need to start the action much earlier which makes it less like you end up with a shot with 1 second left.

Not saying its a bad idea, just requires a different set. Also, these days pick and rolls generally involve other action by shooters to get open and confuse the defense and often a second screen set on or off the ball (think the elevator doors set run by a ton of NBA teams now). Can be done and might be a better last second shot set, but its can get complicated.
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2229 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:02 pm to
Tried to explain it in my post below. Also the post pass off a trap is an extremely hard pass even if the Magic, Stockton, and Chris Pauls of the world make it look easy at times.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39159 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:30 pm to
You're way off base if you think that was well executed.

And "no putbacks"? WTF not!?!

Also, third option is Patterson if his man sags down? Not the way this play was executed. He would have gotten the shot off two seconds after the buzzer!

I liked the play. I like that Gray had it in his hands with the possibilities you mentioned. But, in spite of having an overall great game, Gray blew it. He should have found a way to drive four seconds earlier. If Hornsby had missed this board would be alight over having no time for a putback - and rightfully so.
Posted by tgr4ever
Gwinnett, baw
Member since Jul 2011
16214 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

But, in spite of having an overall great game, Gray blew it.
He made the game wining pass dude
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39979 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

But, in spite of having an overall great game, Gray blew it.

Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35382 posts
Posted on 3/8/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Ok, so drop the % from 85% down to 60%.

Do you still take a 40% chance at a game-winner over a 60% chance?
Coach Jones likes to leave 0% chance to lose the game in those situations. A charge sends Arkansas to the line and a made layup leaves a second or two on the clock.

He plays the last play of the half the same way. He would settle for a 5% shot if he had to make sure the other team can't answer.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram