Started By
Message
locked post

Is CFB becomming more and more top heavy?

Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:46 am
Posted by Dan
Austin
Member since Dec 2006
2454 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:46 am
Seems like this same exact class several years ago would have been number 1 easily. But, there are 5 other classes ranked ahead of ours this year.

Please understand this is not a thread to bitch about our class, this was a great haul.

It just feels like more and more highly skilled recruits are slowly choosing fewer and fewer different schools, which will eventually lead to less parity.

Comments? Insults?

Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37584 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:47 am to
Complete opposite, IMO.

Its too early in the morning to think of the word, but its to the point where anyone can beat anyone on any given day.
Posted by Dan
Austin
Member since Dec 2006
2454 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Its too early in the morning to think of the word, but its to the point where anyone can beat anyone on any given day.



parity...........
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37584 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:49 am to
There's that big word I was looking for
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:49 am to
If you think they are top heavy now, you should wait for next years recruiting rules to kick in. The programs with money are about to dominate the recruiting with almost zero restrictions. WTF the NCAA was thinking with the new rules is mind boggling. You're about to see programs with staffs strictly for recruiting. NCAA just took three steps back.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 8:50 am
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 8:50 am to
As long as LSU is in the top heavy group, I really don't give a shite about parity across all of college football.
Posted by denvertiger
Golden
Member since Feb 2007
3919 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:10 am to
quote:

As long as LSU is in the top heavy group, I really don't give a shite about parity across all of college football


This
Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Complete opposite, IMO.
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31727 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:23 am to
I agree it is very top heavy imo.

Bama
LSU
Oregon
Stanford
OSU
A&M
UF
UGA
USC - but fading fast
Texass - need to get rid of Alamo Mack









Everyone Else imo

sure a few upsets happen here and there. but by and large, the champ is coming out of a group like that in recent years.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 9:24 am
Posted by Boudin
Lafayette
Member since Oct 2006
10133 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:23 am to
quote:

If you think they are top heavy now, you should wait for next years recruiting rules to kick in. The programs with money are about to dominate the recruiting with almost zero restrictions. WTF the NCAA was thinking with the new rules is mind boggling. You're about to see programs with staffs strictly for recruiting. NCAA just took three steps back.


??

I have not heard about this.. Can you tell me more?
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I have not heard about this.. Can you tell me more?



Here's some of the proposals with a link to the article.

quote:

"We want to focus on those things that actually make a difference in our institutions and not necessarily those things that deal with communication devices or whether or not a bagel has peanut butter on it," Emmert said at the time. A Rules
Working Group comprised of college presidents took on the task of revising the rulebook, ultimately forwarding 26 proposals to the Board of Directors last weekend. The board approved 25 of them, including five that focus specifically on recruiting:
• Proposal 11-2, which allows for football programs to hire a recruiting coordinator and support staff separate from the coaching staff, any of whom can partake in all recruiting activities save for off-campus visits.
• Proposal 11-4, which eliminates restrictions on how many coaches can recruit off campus at a given time.
• Proposal 13-3, which "eliminate[s] restrictions on methods and modes of communication during recruiting," meaning no texting barriers, quiet periods or dead periods.
• Proposal 13-4, which eliminates a list of required materials (a banned-drug list, APR data) schools must send to recruits.
• Proposal 13-5A, which eliminates restrictions on sending printed materials (media guides, comic books, etc.) to recruits.



LINK

Rules 11-2 and 11-4 are game changers.
This post was edited on 2/7/13 at 9:29 am
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32793 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:48 am to
Conference-wise, it's unreal. Arkansas finished dead last in the Western division in the team recruiting rankings (according to Rivals) and still finished 31st in the country (out of 123 teams).
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:56 am to
CFB is only top-heavy with regards to conferences, i.e. the SEC is at the top, and no other conference even comes close. Within the SEC, however, most teams have a chance of winning any particular game.
Posted by Big Lake
Member since Jul 2011
3844 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 10:59 am to
The teams with money will be able to umbrella the entire nation instead of picking and choosing their battles.

Small schools are gonna get screwed
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 11:18 am to
Go look at the 60's and 70's. For all the SEC mania, teams like Oregon, Kansas State, Okla State have all played in or been in the hunt for the BCS CG late in the last 2 seasons. USCe has had back to back 11 win seasons. Texas A&M is a top 5 team with a freshman Heisman winner. While yes, 1 team has won 3 of 4 BCS CG and has yet again a #1 ranked class. CFB is now more open than its ever been.
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The teams with money will be able to umbrella the entire nation instead of picking and choosing their battles.


And the kids are going to be inundated like never before. These kids won't get a moment of peace.
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Arkansas finished dead last in the Western division in the team recruiting rankings (according to Rivals) and still finished 31st in the country (out of 123 teams)


Lets see if this actually repeats.. doubtful Shannon can steal as many recruits from south florida if new staff has a piss poor season.
Posted by WalkingTurtles
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2013
5913 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:56 pm to
I think actually what we are seeing is what fan bases are the most willing to spend money, generate ratings and revenue and follow the sport. These recruiting rankings and websites play to their customers, which is a very smart business move but that's what happens.

On the field, the athletes are very equal almost anywhere you go. The only parity comes from the coaches, and that is a reflection of the fan base as well in terms of money.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37584 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

On the field, the athletes are very equal almost anywhere you go. The only parity comes from the coaches, and that is a reflection of the fan base as well in terms of money.


Posted by WalkingTurtles
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2013
5913 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 7:20 pm to
Wow, great post you bring a lot to the conversation. Interesting that the majority of schools have kids that run fast, can bench press, run catch and pass, yet they develop at different rates from the quality of the coaching the receive. That's just my opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram