If we miss on the big fish, who do we take?

I want AG no matter what

looking at the top La players...i'm curious about these..

are we looking at any of these guys red..??? Their all highly rated prospects.

DAYLON CHARLOT

JERRY TILLERY (any chance he flips..??)

KENDALL BUSSEY (no offer...we won't take another RB anyway)

quote:

---

DAYLON CHARLOT

JERRY TILLERY (any chance he flips..??)

KENDALL BUSSEY (no offer...we won't take another RB anyway)

---

Tillery's ship has sailed...Never offered Bussey due to (Guice, Brossette, and Ducre)....I honestly feel it's either Charlot or Dillon for us but not both...all reports are indicating Dillon might be the one who signs with us on NSD.

Garrett Thomas loves LSU.
Not sure why he wasn't offered.
Just know his cousin posts here and said he was a big fan.

I really like McGinnis too. We'll see though, but I bet they wouldn't finish this class and load up next year.

Hopefully Steele has met with AM already because he does like his style of LB

i like bigger lbers too...i hated watching bama lbers..so well coached, disciplined and mean.

quote:

---

Grant Burguillos-admittedly a fan because of his dad and his love for the Tigers but this is a kid that can play all 5 spots on the OL and that is not something you find every day. IMO he's safer than a couple of OL we have committed. Not as much pure upside as Brown or Shipley but he's safer. Kid moves well and knows how to play the position. If we took him I'd bet he's the starting C in 2-3 years. OL is a crap shoot and guys that work their arse off like Grant make it in the NFL for a decade.

---

I think most are fans of his dad.

Thanks cousin

Also, the lack of last minute offers thus far leads me to believe the staff feels comfortable landing some of these big fish. We really don't see any offers or moves of desperation at this point

Javahn ferguson probably gets in this class too

That's what I meant by without discipline they'd be average. They don't move well in space and its why they've not been as good the past 2 years. Their ranking is good because their DL and talent/strength are too much for most teams that can't match up physically. Look at their defensive stats versus teams that can match them physically at the LOS and you'll see they can be had. The reason we play them so well is because we match them physically and athletically and its evident moreso because our offense is the perfect offense for them to stop. We line up and run right at them which is perfect for their defense to stop. Our success(relatively) is because we match them physically. They really struggle with Auburn, TAM and OM(though not too bad with OM) because those teams stretch their LBs out while being able to match their DLs physicality. Why I think its paramount that we move our offense towards a zone read or speead , at least against them. We can match up but they beat us with scheme, confusion and discipline. The game plan in the 11 regular season game was half perfect. Imagine our rbs and wrs against that D with a decent qb and an offense that spreads their lbs out and makes them respect the edge? We have too many horses for them to stop us. Hell just with a decent QB we beat them most years.

Ftr record I don't want lbs like theirs just the disviplone . however give me 3-4 CJ Moseleys or Beckwiths and I'd be in heaven. Problem is that their aren't many like those guys.