Started By
Message

Military FPS Games Need New Blood

Posted on 1/9/14 at 8:57 am
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 8:57 am
Call of Duty and Battlefield have their places. But they are turning into or have turned into the Walmarts of FPS games.

They're getting dumbed down.

Here's what I think the next military FPS should focus on:

1. The gun. The gun should be authentic, weighty, and impactful. It should be customizable and unique. You should want to play this game because the guns have a feel and immersion to them that makes them feel almost realistic. There should be no target finders. There's no way in hell a red laser adds accuracy to your gun when you shoot from the hip. It's just there to help you ADS.

2. Teamwork. Coordinating streaks or when to clear an area.

3. Point streaks that are complimentary, not individualistic. The best example I can come up with is the UAV + Chopper in CoD4. Or the Raven UAV and Apache streaks in Warfighter.

4. Players should be rewarded for timing their streak rewards when used at appropriate times, like if a team needs to plant a bomb, a player uses a smoke mortar to mask the site and another teammate successfully plants...that should be rewarded.

5. Immersion. Look, we can't just run over a gun and get it's ammo in real life. Show the mags on the ground, make your player hit a button to pick them up. It can be a quick animation...nothing that holds you up or makes you too vulnerable. Or if I want to give my teammate a mag, toss him one. Don't just make it magically appear in inventory.

6. Real geographic regions or landmarks that are centered or the basis of maps. Washington, DC. Downtown Baghdad. Fallujah. Islamabad. Abbottabad. JFK Airport. Rural New York. The mountains and valleys of Afghanistan.

I saw a new FPS called Get Even on IGN. Trailer inside the link...I don't know what it is or how things play out, but it at least got me thinking something new is needed especially with the new consoles.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:01 am to
LINK
Made a thread for it yesterday but I do agree with you. I'm hoping titanfall brings enough difference.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23126 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:06 am to
I agree with you on all points but there doesn't appear to be anything like that on the horizon. Maybe it's too niche of a game? It costs so much for these studios to create and deliver a game they must insure that their product appeals to a mass audience.

I think it's time for COD or BF to go back to WWII era. The new tech would allow for greater immersion and the gamer can take a break from all of the future weapon technology bullshite going on in these games.
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 9:07 am
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:08 am to
Titanfall is not really what I'm looking for, even though it will be new blood. I want something that feels like the last 30 minutes of Zero Dark Thirty.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I think it's time for COD or BF to go back to WWII era. The new tech would allow for greater immersion and the gamer can take a break from all of the future weapon technology bullshite going on in these games.
I wouldn't mind a return to WWII, but I think "future" weapons aren't neccesary. I think "now" weapons and how they can be realistically kitted and customized would be a great focus of a new IP.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Look, we can't just run over a gun and get it's ammo in real life. Show the mags on the ground, make your player hit a button to pick them up. It can be a quick animation...nothing that holds you up or makes you too vulnerable.


The first Borderlands made you do this (animation was the ammo zooming at your face), and that was alright for a bit, but when 2 allowed you to automatically pick it up when walking over it, I didn't miss the old method. I think this would be nightmarish in a competitive MP game and would get old quick. It's one of those unrealistic aspects of shooters that I think is necessary.

quote:

Teamwork. Coordinating streaks or when to clear an area.


I think this is dependent on who you are playing with. That aspect is there for BF, not necessarily with COD, but if you're with a bunch of kill whore run and gunners, it won't happen. I'd like a game that forced you to play as a team, but that would probably cut out a good chunk of the shooter market.


Any kind of point/kill streak can DIAF, IMO. I'm a purists, I suppose, when it comes to that. Prefer the old COD or Halo setup where everyone just goes against everyone, even field, best player wins out. I know streaks reward good play, but there are always players who find exploits to make attaining those easier, and eventually that becomes the main focus of a majority of the player base.
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29170 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:14 am to
Or you could play better games.
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15016 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:14 am to
That sound interesting but as it stands military sim games (which is what you are describing) are niche titles. Very little chance a major developer/publisher would take a chance on it.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Or you could play better games.

Honestly i think that is the key. right now the military market is aiming at the masses and what they are doing is selling. BF3 was fun but I wasn't crazy about it so I passed on bf4. I'm loving borderlands though and looking forward to the new wolfenstein later this year, if it makes it...
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:18 am to
quote:

That sound interesting but as it stands military sim games (which is what you are describing) are niche titles. Very little chance a major developer/publisher would take a chance on it.
And that's exactly the point. To have a game that is niche-like and not catered to the derps.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Or you could play better games.
I know there are plenty good games out there, but I don't like cartoon characters and zombies or ray guns and all that.

I'm not making light of that style, it's just not what I like.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:22 am to
have you tried it? not being a dick, asking a legit question
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:22 am to
Derps have taken over the market and that's where the money is.

If they hadn't have royally screwed up the Operation Flashpoint franchise, there would be your game.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:23 am to
quote:

I know there are plenty good games out there, but I don't like cartoon characters and zombies or ray guns and all that.

I'm not making light of that style, it's just not what I like.



That's all fine and good, but if you are going to stick with mainly military shooters, you're at the mercy of that market, and it's all generic now.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:24 am to
No, I haven't. And I probably won't. That's my ignorance and I completely own it.

@ sic, I associate derps with snipers. Sniper rifles need to be taken completely out of this new FPS.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65839 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:25 am to
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:26 am to
I ask that because when I saw games with the design like borderlands or even wind waker for the zelda series I was not a fan. Once I gave it a shot I really enjoyed it. Honestly once you start playing you don't even notice.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:28 am to
Just taking out snipers isn't going to fix the genre. I know you're not a COD guy, but the super marathon akimbo knifey guys are just as big of a headache to me.


Get rid of perks, like the ones that allow you to perform outside of the bounds of a normal soldier. If you're going to fall 3 stories, heck yeah you need to take some serious damage if not die.
Posted by Antiheroaz
may the odds be ever in your favor.
Member since Dec 2009
19927 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:28 am to
You will never have a video game showing destruction of a real life American City, or replicas of cities that American men and women recently fought and died in. It's just too emotional.
Signed ,
Bleeding heart Liberals

ETA: I'd love a 'Red Dawn' styled Sim FWIW
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 9:29 am
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30212 posts
Posted on 1/9/14 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I think it's time for COD or BF to go back to WWII era. The new tech would allow for greater immersion and the gamer can take a break from all of the future weapon technology bullshite going on in these games.


This^^^^

Honestly, I wouldn't mind seeing a new Vietnam era FPS with all this updated technology. I was late to the party of BFBC2:Vietnam, but that was one of the most fun FPS games I've played.

BF3 and COD 4 were my most favorite "modern warfare" fps, but in all honesty, I'm way more partial to WWII and Vietnam than all this futuristic bs they keep putting out.

ETA:

quote:

Get rid of perks, like the ones that allow you to perform outside of the bounds of a normal soldier. If you're going to fall 3 stories, heck yeah you need to take some serious damage if not die.


The perk system wasn't too bad in COD 4, but COD has too "arcade-like" for my taste.

As far as snipers, I love the class and what it is SUPPOSED to represent, but the people who play those classes are 9 times out of 10 lone wolf players who refuse to help the team or even utilize the class to its full potential as it pertains to helping the team.

You also should not be able to run and gun at close range effectively with a sniper rifle vs someone with an m16, shotgun or SMG.
This post was edited on 1/9/14 at 9:34 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram