Started By
Message
locked post

Genetically Modified Foods Article...

Posted on 2/27/11 at 3:18 pm
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6507 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 3:18 pm

In case anybody didn't read this yet:

LINK

That salmon picture is pretty freakin' scary!
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12892 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 3:48 pm to
Why is the salmon picture scary? Seems like a rather efficient endeavor to me.
Posted by BrockLanders
By Appointment Only
Member since Sep 2008
6507 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Seems like a rather efficient endeavor to me.


Well, your efficient might be my unnatural.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
56030 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 6:12 pm to
agreed...the salmon is a damn monster compared to the natural one...

I really have no problem with eating genetically altered food, though....I actually see it as a great alternative to the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides....
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 7:00 pm to
and your unnatural might be my dinner

for like a week
Posted by TigerByte
Member since Dec 2007
162 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 7:13 pm to
Penn and Teller had an episode for the bullshite series that discussed genetically modified foods. It's been sometime ago but the basis of it was that without genetically modified food there would be a lot more starving people.

Also, to me it eating genetically modified food would be a lot better then eating food thats been pumped with steroids and antibiotics and such.
Posted by Oyster
North Shore
Member since Feb 2009
10224 posts
Posted on 2/27/11 at 9:20 pm to
Chickens at Walmart to me are really scary!
Posted by tetu
Ascension Parish
Member since Jan 2011
12269 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 6:58 am to
quote:

I actually see it as a great alternative to the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides....


They still use pesticides and herbicides. The plants are just immune to them so they can actually use more without harming the crops.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12892 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 7:19 am to
Why take issue with a food item because of a natural process used to accelerate growth? Since nature allowed it, how is that unnatural?

What benefit does taking such a position get you?
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58890 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Well, your efficient might be my unnatural.



Exactly.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:34 am to
There is nothing wrong with GM food. Did an extensive research into them for a class, a semester long process. My conclusion: I will now go out of my way to make sure I don't buy organic. GM Food is the only way we will be able to feed the world. Look up Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution. He single-handedly saved billions of lives by introducing high-yield crops and genetically modified foods to the world.

these crops are designed now to be drought-resistant - good for areas in Africa and Mexico, use less land to produce more tonnage, and there is even a red-rice developed to help prevent blindness from malnutrition in third-world children. It contains a certain vitamin that is not available through natural foods these kids get.

Organic or "natural" foods are a scam.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12892 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 7:38 pm to
Think how many lives could be saved in Africa if the feel-gooders had not influenced the decision makers to not permit genetically modified crops.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 7:40 pm
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
48847 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

There is nothing wrong with GM food. Did an extensive research into them for a class, a semester long process. My conclusion: I will now go out of my way to make sure I don't buy organic. GM Food is the only way we will be able to feed the world. Look up Norman Borlaug, the father of the Green Revolution. He single-handedly saved billions of lives by introducing high-yield crops and genetically modified foods to the world.

these crops are designed now to be drought-resistant - good for areas in Africa and Mexico, use less land to produce more tonnage, and there is even a red-rice developed to help prevent blindness from malnutrition in third-world children. It contains a certain vitamin that is not available through natural foods these kids get.


This is the absolute correct answer. Without genetically modified corn alone the famines would be incredible. This will only be needed more in our future world which America feeds and will continue to feed. Many people do not realize this including many that receive the food.

I have a ton of Monsanto stock.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Think how many lives could be saved in Africa if the feel-gooders had not influenced the decision makers to not permit genetically modified crops.



So true. By Europe banning the purchase of GM foods through trade, they basically signed Africa's death warrant. Where does Europe get most of it's crops? Africa. Now Africa will not grow GM foods because Europe won't buy them.

Shame really.
Posted by BROffshoreTigerFan
Edmond, OK
Member since Oct 2007
10004 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 6:55 am to
quote:

I really have no problem with eating genetically altered food, though....I actually see it as a great alternative to the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides....


Organic growing is a great way to get away from the use of pesticides and herbicides.

If this just ended with GM foods, that would be fine. But the GM seeds and crops contaminate organic farms, causing them not to be organic any more. Also, Monsanto has legally gone after farmers who do not buy his seeds, but end up growing his strain of corn because of contamination from nearby farms.

We've just started growing all of our veggies organically. Once harvested, I don't plan on ever buying any veggies from any stores.

I think we have a right to know as consumers if we are buying GM foods/products. This is just another play by a big business, backed by the federal government, that will put small market farmers, and organic farmers out of business.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 7:02 am to
quote:


Organic growing is a great way to get away from the use of pesticides and herbicides.
but decrease yields for no good reason

quote:

But the GM seeds and crops contaminate organic farms, causing them not to be organic any more.
:omg:

Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58890 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 7:18 am to
quote:

GM Food is the only way we will be able to feed the world


When did it become our responsibility to feed the world, and does the rest of the world not have the ability to grow it's own crops and raise it's own farm animals?

quote:

these crops are designed now to be drought-resistant - good for areas in Africa and Mexico, use less land to produce more tonnage, and there is even a red-rice developed to help prevent blindness from malnutrition in third-world children. It contains a certain vitamin that is not available through natural foods these kids get.



Good, let them both grow it and eat it, or we can grow it especially for them. Or you can eat it along with them, but I prefer a more natural approach to both my proteins and my produce.


quote:

Organic or "natural" foods are a scam.



God has been scamming humans all the way up to us engineering foods?

So normal chickens are a scam, but the pterodactyl chickens are the real thing. We finally got it right huh? Cows were never REALLY intented to eat grass, but rather corn. I see. How couldn't I have seen it. Ole God's been pulling the wool over our eyes the whole time up until the 50s I guess. Man He's sneaky.

Posted by BROffshoreTigerFan
Edmond, OK
Member since Oct 2007
10004 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 7:31 am to
quote:

but decrease yields for no good reason


Really? Have you tried growing organic? My yields are actually better growing organically. But then again, I've done the work and can compare the two against each other.

Your little OMG ONOZ was cute. I tend to think that the farmers that lose their organic farm status and cannot sell their harvests any more would be a bigger problem to them. Putting farmers out of business is really good for feeding people.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58890 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Monsanto has legally gone after farmers who do not buy his seeds, but end up growing his strain of corn because of contamination from nearby farms.


I wonder what will happen once Monsanto has finally gotten us down to a couple of varieties of corn let's say and a disease strikes it that it cannot defend itself against. What do you think will happen to a food industry that is so heavily dependent upon corn as ours is?



quote:

I think we have a right to know as consumers if we are buying GM foods/products.



As we do if we are purchasing cloned chickens or not, but again, the FDA has not mandated such wording is necessary.




quote:

This is just another play by a big business, backed by the federal government, that will put small market farmers, and organic farmers out of business.



The line between Monsanto and the Federal Government via the FDA are skewed to put it mildly. Politicians depend upon the money from Monsanto, Monsanto depends upon the politicians, and we have put ourselves in such a position with an enormous power as Monsanto has become so that we depend upon them for everything both food and economic related. They control, and I do mean CONTROL the FDA from the Top Dog on down, and the revolving door of the FDA and Monsanto is such that truly they should share the same building. It would make it so much easier for transitions between the two when employees take positions within each other. No need to move have to find a new house. Just go from the sixth floor to the 19th floor.




This post was edited on 3/1/11 at 7:47 am
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12892 posts
Posted on 3/1/11 at 8:38 am to
quote:

I wonder what will happen once Monsanto has finally gotten us down to a couple of varieties of corn let's say and a disease strikes it that it cannot defend itself against. What do you think will happen to a food industry that is so heavily dependent upon corn as ours is?


Why on earth do you believe a successful business would handicap their sustainability like that?

What will happen to us? As long as corn can grow and free trade exists, we'll have access to corn. But first, let's get rid of corn subsidies so we can benefit from true market signals like price fluctuations. When the price rises, unhealthy foods the depend on cheap sweeteners like high fructose corn syrup will get more expensive. We'll have fewer fatties who consume less resources off the backs of taxpayers.


quote:

Politicians depend upon the money from Monsanto, Monsanto depends upon the politicians, and we have put ourselves in such a position with an enormous power as Monsanto has become so that we depend upon them for everything both food and economic related. They control, and I do mean CONTROL the FDA from the Top Dog on down, and the revolving door of the FDA and Monsanto is such that truly they should share the same building.

<------ Bought Monsanto stock in July at $47/share
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram