Started By
Message

Trading Mahomes and Lamb for Tua and Waddle- as commissioner would you allow this trade???

Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:18 pm
Posted by davidsheroes
Los Angeles
Member since May 2007
3523 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:18 pm
Trading Mahomes and lamb for Tua and Waddle- what do you think - please help.

Is this a good trade- what are your thoughts?

As a commissioner would you allow this trade?
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 6:40 am
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8308 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:18 pm to
Redraft or Dynasty?
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14099 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:41 pm to
I'll take the Mahomes/Lamb side of that.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93656 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 2:31 pm to
Definitely. Give me Mahomes over Tua and Lamb over Waddle. Plus Tua is way more likely to get hurt that Mahomes IMO.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41877 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 3:34 pm to
I wouldn’t
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34215 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 3:48 pm to
Nah. If Tua stays healthy then you might come out on top in the QB spot but too much drop off in value from Lamb to Waddle imo.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40450 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 4:28 pm to
Also I’m not in the “avoid guys from the same team” camp but a WR and QB are highly correlated and the odds of them both dropping a turd in the same week are higher than two separate team guys. That said, if it was Tua and Hill sign me up, just don’t think Waddle is consistent enough.
Posted by davidsheroes
Los Angeles
Member since May 2007
3523 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:40 am to
As commissioner - would you allow this trade?
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37133 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:55 am to
Why the frick wouldn’t you allow this trade?
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14099 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:18 am to
quote:

As commissioner - would you allow this trade?


If it doesn’t smell of collusion, as commissioner I’d STFU
Posted by Mpd31
Member since Nov 2019
2896 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:34 am to
I hate the trade but it isn’t completely lopsided to where I would consider vetoing it
Posted by LSUtiger89
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
3635 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:59 am to
Yes. It’s not your place to apply value of players for other members.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11150 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:02 am to
Would I trade Mahomes and Lamb for Tua and Waddle? Heck no.

Would I veto the trade without evidence one team was tanking on purpose? No.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71991 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:01 am to
What are the records of the teams? Did one guy go to Bama? Did you ask him to justify wanting the dolphin duo over mahomes and lamb?
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8419 posts
Posted on 10/31/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

As commissioner - would you allow this trade?



No, I wouldn't allow it. As commish I would veto any 60/40 trade and I bet all my leaguemates would love playing in my league.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41877 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 6:38 am to
quote:

I wouldn’t


Make the trade, that is.
Posted by davidsheroes
Los Angeles
Member since May 2007
3523 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 7:22 am to
quote:

What are the records of the teams? Did one guy go to Bama? Did you ask him to justify wanting the dolphin duo over mahomes and lamb?


The team asking for the trade and getting Mahomes and lamb is 6-2 while the team accepting the trade and getting Tua and waddle is 1-7

Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71991 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 1:31 pm to
At 1-7, the motivation for trading down at the same two positions is ______ .

Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65855 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

The team asking for the trade and getting Mahomes and lamb is 6-2 while the team accepting the trade and getting Tua and waddle is 1-7


I am not a veto guy, but with this context it is questionable.

It is still probably not veto worthy.
Posted by LaGaToR
Gainesville
Member since Jun 2011
195 posts
Posted on 11/1/23 at 8:02 pm to
No chance should this be vetod.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram