- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL Week 5: Bye Weeks Begin....
Posted on 10/4/11 at 3:58 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Posted on 10/4/11 at 3:58 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
but this is the first time in TDFL history that that edict has been issued.
has anyone after 4 weeks:
1. Not set their lineup, having 2 injured guys in there, 1 who is out for the season
2. said they have no reason to play
3. made ZERO transactions to try and get better(zero FA adds, no trades, nothing)
This post was edited on 10/4/11 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 10/4/11 at 3:59 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
..and didn't we vote down keepers already?
Well you can't really have keepers or trade draft picks if we are going to re-draft conferences every season.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:00 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Then we have to keep divisions the same year to year. And if we do that we might as well allow draft pick trading.
No, I've already mentioned a way of adding keepers without locking conferences. You would only be able to keep 1-2 though.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:03 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
has anyone after 4 weeks:
He's probably the only person in TDFL history to draft from his iphone while at a pool party as well; missing several picks in the process.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:05 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Then we have to keep divisions the same year to year. And if we do that we might as well allow draft pick trading.
all of this should be allowed to allow for more trading. Keepers are not necessary but I wouldn't mind seeing at least one keeper
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:08 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
all of this should be allowed to allow for more trading. Keepers are not necessary but I wouldn't mind seeing at least one keeper
McFadden for me.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:08 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
No, I've already mentioned a way of adding keepers without locking conferences. You would only be able to keep 1-2 though.
Basically what, you have to draft your keepers and if two people that end up in the same conference both have Adrian Peterson then one of them is fricked and Peterson is in the draft pool on the other side?
Could be interesting.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:08 pm to TigerPhan27
wouldnt mind being able to trade draft picks, though id lean against no.
I'd say No to keepers all together
being able to trade draft picks will have the same affect as having 1 keeper, or even 2.
I'd say No to keepers all together
being able to trade draft picks will have the same affect as having 1 keeper, or even 2.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:09 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Well you can't really have keepers or trade draft picks if we are going to re-draft conferences every season.
You can't trade draft picks, you can have keepers though.
First thing to do at the start of the year would be to set the conferences.
After that, keepers would be selected - priority goes to the team who finished better the prior season for teams who want to keep the same player (if we kept two, there would be two rounds of keeper selections)
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:10 pm to PortCityTiger24
And for the record, it would have to be voted on before next year and would go into effect the year after. Next year's draft will be a complete re-draft.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:11 pm to LSUBoo
No keepers.
And anyone who quits this early in the season and especially if they intentionally give up and sack the season should be booted without debate. He has stated he has nothing to play for and doesn't give a frick.
And anyone who quits this early in the season and especially if they intentionally give up and sack the season should be booted without debate. He has stated he has nothing to play for and doesn't give a frick.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:12 pm to Lester Earl
I don't let ego get in the way of improving my team.
I'll let a Robbie cano man crush...just not an ego.
I'll let a Robbie cano man crush...just not an ego.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:16 pm to rondo
its not even ego, because he's not trying to improve.
no FA transactions through 4 weeks
leaving injured guys in lineup
he only perked up after we "tried to tell him what to do".
no FA transactions through 4 weeks
leaving injured guys in lineup
he only perked up after we "tried to tell him what to do".
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
he only perked up after we "tried to tell him what to do".
As long as he sets his lineup and doesn't give players away, I don't care what else he does. If he wants to make crazy trades so be it. Just as long as he's not colluding.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:22 pm to Lester Earl
I was talking about the "rondo traded for a qb" jab
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:25 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
If he wants to make crazy trades so be it
see, id agree if he hadn't already made his sentiments known that he "has nothing to play for".
I mean from the outset, im talking the night he drafted his team, he said he knew he had a bad team, and still up to this point has not made any roster moves to improve it. Not even dropping someone who is out for the year.
if he can't "get up" for the first few weeks, when everyone has a shot to make something of their team, he certainly wont once he is down in a hole with a shite sandwich. Just my 2 cents.
its easy to say being in the other division "if he wants to make crazy trades".... it just doesnt affect the balance of your side.
maybe i am a "bitch" and the only one that has a problem with it. So be it. Just talking here. Like i said, nothing personal against anyone. but the whole thing is kind of bush league
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News