Started By
Message

Is this collusion?

Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:45 pm
Posted by Big Floppy TDs
Where the beer flows like wine
Member since Sep 2012
2910 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:45 pm
Team A is on the bubble for the playoffs, but is most likely going to get in. Team B is near bottom of the league.

Team A sends Terrence West, Golden Tate

Team B sends Sanders, Jonas Gray

There are some rumblings in our league about but I personally don't think so
This post was edited on 11/28/14 at 2:47 pm
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:50 pm to
RB4/5 + WR2 for WR1 + RB2/3/4? At this point in my league, I've told everyone to stop trading or else you get situations like this.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
20969 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:52 pm to
The trade deadline should of been 1-2 weeks ago.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72017 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:53 pm to
it's tate for sanders. basically they are the same exact fantasy player. west and gray are borderline unownable
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

it's tate for sanders. basically they are the same exact fantasy player. west and gray are borderline unownable

Yep.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Is this collusion?
Collusion say uneven trade. I don't see a huge advantage on either side.

Regardless, you don't have a trade deadline? If not, then it doesn't matter about which teams are making the playoffs with trades. But you're opening up trades for ppl who have nothing to lose or gain by making them.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 3:29 pm to
Not even close.
Posted by rballa19
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4379 posts
Posted on 11/28/14 at 4:50 pm to
Negative
Posted by CapitalCityTiger
Red Stick
Member since Feb 2011
2705 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 4:33 am to
Not at all collusion. There is no way you can tell me with any certainty one will be better than the other the rest of the way.
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:31 am to
Barring injury, sanders will definitely be better the rest of the way. Tate thrived when megatron was playing hurt/out. He still is pretty good but he's no Emmanuel sanders.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66422 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

t's tate for sanders. basically they are the same exact fantasy player. west and gray are borderline unownable
Posted by DriveByBBQ
Willard's Garage
Member since Jan 2011
4608 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:54 am to
no
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27068 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:59 am to
OP like this make me sad.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 12:07 pm to
I'll give you collusion.

Team A (commish, needs a win vs me to make the playoffs) sends mason to team B (last place, hasn't set a lineup in weeks) for flacco. Team B has an empty RB2 slot with mason on the bench.
Flacco is, of course, starting for team A.
Complete bullshite.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59692 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 12:11 pm to
Teams out of the playoffs shouldn't be trading with teams that have a chance to make the playoffs at this point in the season. Whether or not its collusion idk but the trade shouldn't go through.
Posted by forksup
Member since Dec 2013
8817 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 2:43 pm to
That's a fair trade~ but I really dislike trading with teams not in contention anymore.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80778 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 2:47 pm to
Id prefer West and Tate. Why would you think its collusion?
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80778 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 2:48 pm to
That trade isn't really collusion either unless they planned it. Commish is giving up the much better player
Posted by CapitalCityTiger
Red Stick
Member since Feb 2011
2705 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 3:23 pm to
Yeah Mason for Flacco is not collusion either, the circumstances suck but not really collusion. If you stated that the other team had Demarco Murray and Matt Forte and Mason wasn't good enough to crack his lineup, then it would be collusion.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Teams out of the playoffs shouldn't be trading with teams that have a chance to make the playoffs at this point in the season.
Agree
quote:

but the trade shouldn't go through.
No trade deadline then why not? It's not against the rules and it's not unfair.

It's the same concept as the person the other day complaining about his waiver wire requests getting beat out by someone not in the playoffs.

I'd rather play with ppl who play to the end than with ppl who quit in week 5 and stop setting their lineups.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram