Started By
Message

re: What If Nirvana didn't break up

Posted on 2/24/13 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39171 posts
Posted on 2/24/13 at 1:10 pm to
FF are better than 95% of modern radio rock. That's not much of an accomplishment though.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 2/24/13 at 1:57 pm to
They may have been able to finally tune their guitars.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5183 posts
Posted on 2/24/13 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

Ron Wood.


Can't believe I didn't think of Ronnie.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5183 posts
Posted on 2/24/13 at 7:36 pm to
I also like the Foo Fighters better than Nirvana.
Posted by harmonics
Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2010
18615 posts
Posted on 2/24/13 at 8:40 pm to
Nirvana was the leader of the grunge era, but at the end of the day Foo Fighters>>>>>>Nirvana. I am glad things played out the way they did. And no, I am not saying I am glad Cobain killed himself.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 3:22 am to
Alice in Chains>>>>everyone else in that seattle scene.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 3:27 am to
quote:

Foo Fighters>>>>>>Nirvana
Posted by maizegoblue
Florida
Member since Jan 2011
1800 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 4:28 am to
quote:

Is there anybody other than Paul McCartney that has been in 2 bands of that magnitude like Dave Grohl?



Grohl has also been in queens of the stone age.
Posted by maizegoblue
Florida
Member since Jan 2011
1800 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 4:32 am to
quote:

If Grohl did want Nirvana to keep going would the band work with Mudhoney's lead singer?



No. Most people don't know that Kurt Cobain all of Nirvana's music (lyrics and music) until their final album when he allowed Grohl to write the song "Marigold".
Posted by maizegoblue
Florida
Member since Jan 2011
1800 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 4:34 am to
quote:

Alice in Chains>>>>everyone else in that seattle scene.



Alice in Chains is my 2nd favorite band from that era behind Nirvana.

I've never understood the rivalry between fans of those bands about who is/was better.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20442 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 5:38 am to
quote:

Soundgarden >>>>> Alice in Chains>>>>everyone else in that seattle scene.

FIFY
Posted by Kayhill Brown
Member since May 2010
940 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 9:50 am to
Foo Fighters have like one good album (their first) and have been around since the mid 90s. Nirvana has 3 great albums and 2 awesome live albums and were around for 6 or 7 years.

Nirvana also was successful in making punk influenced music palatable for a mainstream audience. And they supported and introduced their fans to tons of awesome indie acts.

In conclusion,

Nirvana > FF
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5183 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Foo Fighters have like one good album (their first) and have been around since the mid 90s.




quote:

And they supported and introduced their fans to tons of awesome indie acts.


Yet many of their fans act as if they are the only band that has ever recorded music.
Posted by Kayhill Brown
Member since May 2010
940 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Yet many of their fans act as if they are the only band that has ever recorded music.


I don't think so. They're just important to people because Nirvana was a gateway to a lot of people's favorite bands. Nirvana is not my favorite band but they certainly started my serious interest in music.

You can say that about any band's fans. I find Led Zeppelin fans often act like they're the only band that matters.
Posted by Chef Leppard
Member since Sep 2011
11739 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

least they didn't create a tv show to find a replacement like one certain Aussie band *cough*


That shite hurt me deep. Hutch was such an icon to have his legacy degraded by that shameful money grab from the remaining members
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34257 posts
Posted on 2/25/13 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

I don't think so. They're just important to people because Nirvana was a gateway to a lot of people's favorite bands. Nirvana is not my favorite band but they certainly started my serious interest in music.

You can say that about any band's fans. I find Led Zeppelin fans often act like they're the only band that matters.


Tool/APC/Puscifier fanboys are looking down on you fools with indignation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram