- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brandin Cooks feels he left a lot of meat on the bone last season
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:56 am to Brandincookem
Posted on 6/15/16 at 9:56 am to Brandincookem
quote:And again and again and again and again and again
Let me just point out again
0
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:05 am to Brandincookem
quote:
refuses to even try to use that speed to breakway in the open field
So he would rather be caught from behind and tackled rather than not be touched or score?
Your being waaaay too obvious of a troll man
This post was edited on 6/15/16 at 10:06 am
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:07 am to Mrwhodat
Not sure how much better Cooks can get honestly. The amount of contact teams get away with on him down field is frustrating to watch and disrupts the timing of his routes. I think his numbers can marginally improve but the biggest jump in production will be the holes he will create for everyone else. Fleener/Snead/Thomas should feast off man to man looks while Cooks pulls coverages with him.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:40 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
contribute and put up half the numbers ODB
Posted on 6/15/16 at 11:55 am to lsufan_26
quote:Actually, I do know him
You know Golden Tate? Tell him I said what's up!
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:18 pm to TechDawg2007
Golden Tate is built almost exactly on the lines of Willie Snead. The two have similar games as well. Cooks is listed at 189 lbs while Tate is listed at 198. That almost 10 lbs difference makes for a different type of power/strength. If we see Cooks at more muscle, I'm sure his game would change to reflect his work in the gym.
This post was edited on 6/15/16 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 6/17/16 at 6:33 pm to goatmilker
Game doesn't lie to me
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:19 pm to Magazine St
quote:
The two have similar games as well
Tate led WR in YAC in 2014, and was 5th last year. The former RB in him shows out.
Cooks was 13th. Good for a guy who falls down or goes out of bounds amirite
Snead was 17th
Posted on 6/18/16 at 1:45 pm to KarlMalonesFlipPhone
"Hey, dirtay, baby I got ya money...."
Posted on 6/18/16 at 2:07 pm to Brandincookem
john brown is 3.5 years older than Cooks
Posted on 6/18/16 at 3:45 pm to Brandincookem
Posted on 6/18/16 at 8:20 pm to dj30
Cooks is a good player..... end of story.
We have other positions to worry about (e.g., OG,DE,OLB, etc.).
We have other positions to worry about (e.g., OG,DE,OLB, etc.).
Posted on 6/20/16 at 10:14 pm to Drillingman
Think Cooks has 1500 yards this year....teams cant totally focus on him anymore with Thomas and Fleener on board.
Posted on 6/25/16 at 10:02 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
Tate led WR in YAC in 2014, and was 5th last year. The former RB in him shows out
I'm sure Tate had more targets as well. I'm talking about how Snead and Tate look physically on the field, they attack the ball similarly and both are physical after the catch. Numbers are not the entire store for any sport.
Posted on 6/25/16 at 11:24 am to Magazine St
I'm not trying to knock Snead. He definitely fights for those extra yards. But YAC per reception favors Tate, too. Tate is a 4.4 guy, Snead is a 4.6 guy. Snead's numbers are still very impressive given his athletic limitations
Posted on 6/25/16 at 11:48 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
I'm not trying to knock Snead. He definitely fights for those extra yards. But YAC per reception favors Tate, too. Tate is a 4.4 guy, Snead is a 4.6 guy. Snead's numbers are still very impressive given his athletic limitations
Agreed that Snead is a good player, but he's limited. Honestly he won't repeat the same numbers he had last year if we're talking Fleener/Thomas/Spiller into the mix and Cooks being even more dangerous.
Posted on 6/25/16 at 12:26 pm to htran90
Cooks should benefit the most from the Fleener addition I think. Might require the safety to cover Fleener a little more instead of doubling up on Cooks.
I think Thomas could be a monster rookie this year too. If he can do some damage in the slot and Fleener is effective on some seam routes that should give Cooks a lot less coverage thrown at him.
I think Thomas could be a monster rookie this year too. If he can do some damage in the slot and Fleener is effective on some seam routes that should give Cooks a lot less coverage thrown at him.
Posted on 6/25/16 at 1:31 pm to Mrwhodat
quote:
he left a lot of meat on the bone last season
Well, now all he needs to do now is throw that meat in a pot with some broth and a potato and baby, we got a stew goin'.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News