Started By
Message

Defense files motion claiming Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from defense

Posted on 11/16/21 at 9:59 pm
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
25254 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 9:59 pm
quote:

Election Wizard
@ElectionWiz

Defense files motion claiming Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle #Rittenhouse defense team.
quote:

Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec

BREAKING NEW MOTION: Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460816537812668425

quote:

Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec
·
1m
The version of the drone footage given to the defense was NOT the same version the prosecution had

Binger only provided the HD original the Saturday AFTER each side had rested


https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460817948596183044
quote:

Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec
And here is the HD version that was withheld from the defense team

The HD version clearly shows Kyle did not aim his rifle at the Ziminskis
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29996 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:03 pm to
Crazy. Prosecutor should be disbarred.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:07 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45379 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:09 pm to
Just like the fbi did.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78072 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:11 pm to
Filed yesterday?
Posted by XxxSpooky1
A place in SE La
Member since Sep 2007
5145 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:14 pm to
Is this real?
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31239 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:14 pm to
Judge should dismiss first thing in the morning.


ETA: Anyone know what time this was filed? The stamp only has a date, not a time.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:17 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76551 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:16 pm to
Interesting but I doubt it's the straw that breaks the camels back and compels the Judge to grant the defense motion to dismiss with prejudice.

If the rumor that jump kick man was known by the prosecutor comes out, then that would be an insta-dismissal.
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
10512 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:17 pm to
This is crazy. The prosecution needs to go to jail.
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
9498 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:20 pm to
A lawyer wrote that?

State will claim it was an accident. The fact they depended on it for a key element could clearly make it exculpable.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:24 pm
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:30 pm to
Yeah this is egregious.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:31 pm
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:36 pm to
This is the 2nd drone video that was introduced immediately after a "gotcha" moment by the prosecution during Rittenhouse's cross examination.

As the Rekieta Law stream pointed out, it would have never been admitted if the defense would not have put Kyle on the stand. And if it wasn't admitted, it would not have allowed the prosecution to successfully argue for provocation instructions because they claimed this 2nd drone video showed Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum. A colossal frickup on the part of the defense that gave the prosecution the opening they needed to save their case.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:38 pm
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
25254 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Jeannie Brichetto
@jeanniebrichett
Replying to
@JackPosobiec

defense attorney from Kyle Rittenhouse filed this motion of mistrial with prejudice on Mon Nov 15th. The judge has not ruled on this motion as the defense brought this up yesterday in court- this is the first time we’re seeing the motion that was filed.

Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
14136 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:37 pm to
Clear Brady violation. That could cost the prosecutor his law license.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28627 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:47 pm to
That’s very interesting. The higher quality video shows Kyle didn’t aim his weapon yet the state claims it did? Oh so that’s Brady evidence…expulcatory or evidence to show innocence. That’s pretty huge.
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:39 pm to
That’s pretty damning. It is grounds to grant the motion (I don’t think the judge will) and for an ethics complaint and hearing regarding the prosecutors.
Posted by TomBuchanan
East Egg, Long Island
Member since Jul 2019
6231 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:46 pm to
14.2, guy was trying to be Arthur Kirkland

Posted by Blitzed
Member since Oct 2009
21326 posts
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:57 pm to
This needs to end tomorrow.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29231 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:30 am to
I never could see anything in the compressed nor the full or doctored up version of the footage. It all just looks like blurry pixels to me.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79360 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:08 am to
So if true, Bingerhad implied the “pixelated yet super focused” LQ video was the only one available?

This should be an interesting twist
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25393 posts
Posted on 11/17/21 at 5:14 am to
Chances that it will be denied because there’s no significant difference.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram