- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Defense files motion claiming Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from defense
Posted on 11/16/21 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 9:59 pm
quote:
Election Wizard
@ElectionWiz
Defense files motion claiming Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle #Rittenhouse defense team.
quote:https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460816537812668425
Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec
BREAKING NEW MOTION: Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team
quote:
Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec
·
1m
The version of the drone footage given to the defense was NOT the same version the prosecution had
Binger only provided the HD original the Saturday AFTER each side had rested
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1460817948596183044
quote:
Jacek Posobiec Flag of United StatesFlag of Poland
@JackPosobiec
And here is the HD version that was withheld from the defense team
The HD version clearly shows Kyle did not aim his rifle at the Ziminskis
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:03 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Crazy. Prosecutor should be disbarred.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:09 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Just like the fbi did.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:11 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Filed yesterday?
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:14 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Judge should dismiss first thing in the morning.
ETA: Anyone know what time this was filed? The stamp only has a date, not a time.
ETA: Anyone know what time this was filed? The stamp only has a date, not a time.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:16 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Interesting but I doubt it's the straw that breaks the camels back and compels the Judge to grant the defense motion to dismiss with prejudice.
If the rumor that jump kick man was known by the prosecutor comes out, then that would be an insta-dismissal.
If the rumor that jump kick man was known by the prosecutor comes out, then that would be an insta-dismissal.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:17 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
This is crazy. The prosecution needs to go to jail.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:20 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
A lawyer wrote that?
State will claim it was an accident. The fact they depended on it for a key element could clearly make it exculpable.
State will claim it was an accident. The fact they depended on it for a key element could clearly make it exculpable.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:30 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Yeah this is egregious.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:36 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
This is the 2nd drone video that was introduced immediately after a "gotcha" moment by the prosecution during Rittenhouse's cross examination.
As the Rekieta Law stream pointed out, it would have never been admitted if the defense would not have put Kyle on the stand. And if it wasn't admitted, it would not have allowed the prosecution to successfully argue for provocation instructions because they claimed this 2nd drone video showed Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum. A colossal frickup on the part of the defense that gave the prosecution the opening they needed to save their case.
As the Rekieta Law stream pointed out, it would have never been admitted if the defense would not have put Kyle on the stand. And if it wasn't admitted, it would not have allowed the prosecution to successfully argue for provocation instructions because they claimed this 2nd drone video showed Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Rosenbaum. A colossal frickup on the part of the defense that gave the prosecution the opening they needed to save their case.
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:38 pm
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:36 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Jeannie Brichetto
@jeanniebrichett
Replying to
@JackPosobiec
defense attorney from Kyle Rittenhouse filed this motion of mistrial with prejudice on Mon Nov 15th. The judge has not ruled on this motion as the defense brought this up yesterday in court- this is the first time we’re seeing the motion that was filed.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:37 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Clear Brady violation. That could cost the prosecutor his law license.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 10:47 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
That’s very interesting. The higher quality video shows Kyle didn’t aim his weapon yet the state claims it did? Oh so that’s Brady evidence…expulcatory or evidence to show innocence. That’s pretty huge.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:39 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
That’s pretty damning. It is grounds to grant the motion (I don’t think the judge will) and for an ethics complaint and hearing regarding the prosecutors.
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:46 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
14.2, guy was trying to be Arthur Kirkland
Posted on 11/16/21 at 11:57 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
This needs to end tomorrow.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:30 am to Bobby OG Johnson
I never could see anything in the compressed nor the full or doctored up version of the footage. It all just looks like blurry pixels to me.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 3:08 am to Bobby OG Johnson
So if true, Bingerhad implied the “pixelated yet super focused” LQ video was the only one available?
This should be an interesting twist
This should be an interesting twist
Posted on 11/17/21 at 5:14 am to Bobby OG Johnson
Chances that it will be denied because there’s no significant difference.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News