Started By
Message

re: The 90% vs The 10%

Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:45 am to
Posted by Kikicaca
1 Mile from the Atchafalaya
Member since Nov 2016
810 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 10:45 am to
quote:

14. I saw 2.9 yards per rush and 30% of rush attempts by QB


From the peanut gallery 90% point of view

I won't even mention the low 3rd down conversions and the impact that has on all phases of the game, because it is above my 90% pay grade.


O could care less about that. He was winning the game no chance for McNeese to win at all. He was resting the injured and getting the line toughened up for SEC play by running plays right into the teeth of the McNeese defense. O nor any other good coach cares about running plays that will make the "fans" happy but not good for the team.

Much like in 2016, 2017 and 2018 when everyone was on my arse about supporting O and Ensminger I proved everyone wrong on another site like this. It will happen again here
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
25548 posts
Posted on 9/16/21 at 11:23 am to
Dude, it doesn’t take a player to break down film. As I’ve pointed out, the game is morphing into something different. This isn’t some “back in my day we did three yards and a cloud of dust” bullshite. The offensive game is about space, angles, percentages, matchups, etc.

You are a damned fool if you think walking on at USL 50 years ago somehow qualifies you to have expert opinions on the game in 2021. Technology, training, dieting, and pretty much every other aspect of the sport has changed since your era. You can probably tell some decent battle stories, but that’s where your expert contributions end.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram