- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:24 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
We are supposed to be absolutely convinced by "99.89%" when it comes to vaccine efficacy, but when I point out that I don't need a vaccine because I have a 99.89% chance of easily surviving this virus, the same liberals screech in disgust.
And when we point out that vaccinated people are dying, the pushers say - but they are old, they have comorbidalities. But before the vaccine age and comorbidalities wasn't considered.
It's almost like a bunch of drones, NPCs, or Chinese social media soldiers are just following pelosi's orders.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:27 am to jjdogg76
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:29 am to Revelator
quote:
According to this article, the CDC doesn’t even test for breakthrough cases unless it results in a hospitalization.
Where does it say the CDC stopped testing? Testing and tracking are not the same thing. They still test for breakthrough cases. The part you quoted says they weren't tracking breakthrough before Delta but are now trying to increase that effort.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:43 am to Dizz
quote:
Where does it say the CDC stopped testing? Testing and tracking are not the same thing. They still test for breakthrough cases. The part you quoted says they weren't tracking breakthrough before Delta but are now trying to increase that effort.
They stopped counting, reporting and monitoring breakthrough cases that didn't require hospitalizations.
Multiple reasons have been given.
Why did they count all positive test results in the beginning?
This is clearly data manipulation.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:44 am to jjdogg76
Israel lol
Posted on 8/10/21 at 10:53 am to Dizz
quote:
They still test for breakthrough cases.
Well, technically the CDC doesn't test individuals. So their job is in the tracking and reporting and advising of. With that in mind, from their own website:
quote:
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause.
LINK
Posted on 8/10/21 at 11:40 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:\
7,525 / 164,000,000 = 0.005% lmfao
Your math only works if the 164,000,000 were all exposed during the period that the 7,525 occurred, you disingenuous frick. lmfao.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 11:49 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
The CDC has been caught in lies numerous times during this pandemic. I have no trust in them anymore as an organization.
They've been lying for decades. They are a govt agency composed of govt workers. They are paid to lie.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 12:17 pm to TigerVespamon
quote:
So the CDC is basically saying that 100% of vaccinated people have break-through cases?
Might your decimal be in the wrong place?
Key words are less than. The CDC is saying between 0-99.9% of people will get a break through infection apparently
Posted on 8/10/21 at 12:47 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
The CDC has been caught in lies numerous times during this pandemic. I have no trust in them anymore as an organization
Seems they believe in their own Hollywood myths. They really botched the testing early on and prevented others from creating alternatives while they clung to their power intoxication.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 12:52 pm to jjdogg76
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/the-israeli-graphs-that-prove-covid-vaccines-are-working-1.10101640
Vaccination appears to be working at reducing hospitalisations while less effective at reducing the transmissions. In any case, it still shows that the number of deaths is far lower than it would be if older people were unvaccinated.
Vaccination appears to be working at reducing hospitalisations while less effective at reducing the transmissions. In any case, it still shows that the number of deaths is far lower than it would be if older people were unvaccinated.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 1:00 pm to jjdogg76
I don't rely on the CDC for any useful information but I am skeptical of anything coming out of Israel as well as their stuff is always worse than anything anyone else is reporting. I wonder are they just not doing something right.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 2:54 pm to TigerVespamon
quote:
Is 99.89% less than 99.9%?
Yes.
So is 4%. And 4% isn’t really close to 100%
Posted on 8/10/21 at 2:59 pm to jjdogg76
I’m vaccinated and have been around known covid positive people in close quarters and didn’t catch it.
No symptoms, nothing.
I even got tested to make sure
No symptoms, nothing.
I even got tested to make sure
Posted on 8/10/21 at 3:04 pm to jjdogg76
quote:
CDC said yesterday that less than 99.9% of vaccinated people have break through cases
So according to them this 99.9% is fine but the same 99.9% statistic in regards to Covid is worthy of mandatory making and shutting down the economy.
No wonder they want to get rid of reading, writing and math.
Posted on 8/10/21 at 3:06 pm to jjdogg76
quote:
CDC said yesterday that less than 99.9% of vaccinated people have break through cases
No. They didn't.
You're literally incapable of reading what they said
Posted on 8/10/21 at 3:07 pm to TBoy
quote:
The confusion may come from OP lying about what actually was said so that he could falsely accuse the CDC of lying.
Correct
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News