- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/7/21 at 1:07 pm to Seldom Seen
I think the editorial decisions they make - require 230 to be inapplicable. Or so I would argue.
frick them. I hope the class plaintiffs own Twitter when this is done. Happy to send a resume
frick them. I hope the class plaintiffs own Twitter when this is done. Happy to send a resume
This post was edited on 7/7/21 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 7/7/21 at 3:08 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Only problem is they still have their Section 230 protection.
The legislation doesn't mention any companies. It mentions platforms, which these companies are not.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News