Started By
Message

re: Pedophile freed after jury determines photo evidence submitted by child's mother was faked

Posted on 6/13/21 at 11:50 am to
Posted by yankeeundercover
Buffalo, NY
Member since Jan 2010
36378 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 11:50 am to
Why or who would photoshop a pedophilia picture? Who stands to gain?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54897 posts
Posted on 6/13/21 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Why or who would photoshop a pedophilia picture? Who stands to gain?

You haven't known many crazy, vindictive women in your life, have you?

Far too often this kind of shite becomes a witch hunt. Almost always it comes from the female involved who, for whatever reason, believes she was wronged by the man. They will use whatever means they have to destroy the man, even their own children. This happens, more often than most of us know, and the woman rarely ever pays for the damage she has done.

It doesn't take a full-fledged trial with a guilty verdict and sentencing to destroy someone with stuff like this. All it takes is an unsubstantiated accusation, and our media will plaster the guy's picture and name all over in print and online. That same media will make minimum effort to retract or report on the ultimate exoneration, and that story will follow that man for the rest of his life. Meanwhile, the woman will just go on living her life. A District Attorney is supposed to be the buffer in cases like this. Sadly, they often are not.
Posted by Paris
Member since Jul 2021
2 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 9:12 am to
Same question I asked. Who would go to them extremes. Clearly people lack common sense! But at the end of the day he will suffer a painful death.... #Soon
This post was edited on 8/25/21 at 9:17 am
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71267 posts
Posted on 2/19/24 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Why or who would photoshop a pedophilia picture? Who stands to gain?


That's where I'm confused in all this.

The alternative to this dude not being a pedophile is the mom photoshopping a pic of her pre-teen daughter having sex.

What the frick?
Posted by Innocent War Vet
Member since Feb 2024
127 posts
Posted on 2/19/24 at 5:55 pm to
Between 14 July 2018 and 28 August 2018, my exwife viewed some YouTube videos I'd posted about her false domestic violence allegations. She was angry and concerned because I'd mentioned her friendship with Chief David Duffett and the BTPD in the videos. So, on 28 August 2018, she went to the Bridgeport Township Police Station and told Chief Duffett and the other officers about the YouTube videos with comments by me about them. Then she and three BTPD officers (led by Sgt Skabardis) came to my home angry and broke in (home invasion) on orders of Chief Duffett! They fabricated the false allegations of a bond violation in an attempt to cover up their home invasion and conspiracy. That's why the officers were so angry, cursing and I was assaulted and arrested for no legal reason. And the first thing my exwife did (up at 3:37 AM, 29 August 2018, still posting and deleting) after I was falsely arrested was get on my laptop and tablet to delete the YouTube videos and post a false domestic violence confession on my Facebook page and a messege on my YouTube page, "Hypocrite arse woman beater JONATHAN NETTLES". Then, the divorce filing (11 September 2018) and false child abuse allegations (12 September 2018) followed. She sat down with Chief Duffett on 12 September 2018 in his office to discuss the conspiracy with "No cameras" for secrecy. She'd signed a Spousal Agreement in July 2011, agreeing not to cheat, share, and remain married until death. Thus, child abuse allegations and a Default Judgment in the divorce would allow her to avoid keeping her promises listed in the Spousal Agreement. Chief Duffett ordered Sgt Skabardis and Officer Palmreuter to go to my home at 2560 King Rd and illegally seize my property without a warrant on 12 September 2018. They did. A search warrant was subsequently obtained by Sgt Skabardis on 28 September 2018, but didn't authorize my home to be searched. My items weren't given to state police CCU to be analyzed until October 2018 (about a month after illegal seizure). A January 4, 2019 Facebook post by my estranged wife states, "Owe myself so much in 2019, I'm coming so hard, this shite personal." And she emphasized, "Very personal!" Clearly directed at her estranged husband (myself)! That Facebook post was right after the 2nd CAN Council interview (conducted without probable cause) of our daughter (alleged victim) on 17 December 2018. The CPS interview and petition followed in January 2019...But, their problem was, state police CCU (Brian Pitt) stated in his final report on 23 January 2019, "Nothing criminal was found" and gave my items back to Sgt Skabardis. However, months later, in March 2019, Sgt Skabardis, without a valid search warrant, resubmited Item #1 (a CD) for a 2nd search, without probable cause to do so. Brian Pitt conducted a warrantless search anyways, in violation of the 4th Amendment. Subsequently, a tiny Thumbnail image was allegedly found containing CSAM (an unidentified male in it). I was then arrested on 10 April 2019 (my youngest daughter's birthday) and sat in jail with NO BOND until proving my innocence at trial. My estranged wife got her default judgment while I rotted in jail. Jail guards had refused to take me to the final divorce hearing, even though I'd put in numerous requests over a week prior and begged to be taken the day of the hearing!...
This post was edited on 2/19/24 at 8:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram