Started By
Message

re: Who was the Unions greatest soldier?

Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
15375 posts
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:21 pm to
Union won because of industrialization and a naval blockade. Southern baws had more heart and better strategy.

Good soldiers on both sides but Union had poor commanders besides Grant and Sherman while the South had a bunch of good commanders.
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 7:23 pm
Posted by Ham And Glass
Member since Nov 2016
1526 posts
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:26 pm to
Anaconda Plan. Dissolution of Dix-Hill agreement. Money. Perceived moral high ground. Industrial base. Expendable immigrants.

Realize I didn’t answer. Edit to say I’m not sure.
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 7:29 pm
Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
10583 posts
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

the South had a bunch of good commanders.

Braxton Bragg says “hold my beer.”

Starting a war you have no chance of winning is not good strategy.
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 7:33 pm
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89775 posts
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Southern baws had more heart


There was certainly a lot of truth to the whole suggestion that the average Confederate was worth about 7 Yankees - that was likely pretty close in 1861 and, maybe, into 1862. But, by 1863, it was much closer to even.

And Yankee generals got better (meaning the terrible generals they started the war off kept getting fired and eventually replaced with better generals).

But, wars aren't really won on the battlefield, they're just fought there. Wars are won on the farms producing food, factories producing guns, arms, boots, ammunition, etc. And the Yanks produced more than they could use.

By the Spring of 1865, the Union Army had more troops in Colored regiments than the Confederate Army had in all regiments.

:letthatsinkin:
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 7:49 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
28014 posts
Posted on 4/4/20 at 9:23 pm to
Initially the North had a bunch of frictards running the war whenit realized Winfield Scott was too old and Robert E.Lee was not going to take it. But once they got Grant in charge in the West, they knew they had something special because he would fight.

The South should have rethought things as soon as it realized that the North was going to keep Kentucky and therefore control all of the Ohio River which also meant they could now send barges of men and material to Nashville and as far south as Muscle Shoals, AL. When your enemy can drop 65,000 troops into the center of your territory, it is over.

If Shiloh and Nashville were not enough, when Farragut races past those forts South of New Orleans and trains all of his cannon on the New Orleans levees it was really over then.

The rest was just gratuitous slaughter for the hell of it.
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 9:24 pm
Posted by PhillyFan1994
Member since Sep 2012
2032 posts
Posted on 4/5/20 at 3:24 am to
quote:

Union won


All that matters. ????
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram