- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 failed moon landings (south side issues...)
Posted on 9/10/19 at 4:22 pm to JPinLondon
Posted on 9/10/19 at 4:22 pm to JPinLondon
quote:
Got a source?
The OP of this thread professor...
It has always been there (should be easy to spot
) quote:
However, K Sivan, chairman of the Indian Space Research Organization, confirmed Sunday that the lander had been spotted. He told the Times of India that the space agency's Chandrayaan-2 orbiter has spotted Vikram on the lunar service. ISRO is analyzing the data, he said.
This post was edited on 9/10/19 at 4:28 pm
1
Posted on 12/23/19 at 11:02 pm to ThinePreparedAni
So I’ll play devils advocate.
If the moon was formed during a collision with proto earth why would it be unreasonable to assume that heavy metals settled to different areas of the moon rather than being dispersed uniformly?
If the moon was formed during a collision with proto earth why would it be unreasonable to assume that heavy metals settled to different areas of the moon rather than being dispersed uniformly?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News