Started By
Message

re: Truly is a shame Baton Rouge did with the “silent sentinel” monument

Posted on 6/6/19 at 4:18 am to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27238 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 4:18 am to
quote:

As if unable to thrive on good times, the State House sustained another blow that nearly destroyed it in 1906. On June 8, a fire of unknown origin broke out and severely damaged the Senate chamber. The fire was noticed at 1:00am by Picayune reporters finishing their stories after late-night legislative committee meetings. Within a few minutes, townspeople and legislators, some still in their nightclothes, rushed to the grounds. Many ran into the burning building to move vital records to the safety of the grounds and nearby residences. The roof over the Senate chamber was destroyed. Its furnishings were also destroyed, with the exception of one desk -- Senator Stuckey rushed into the burning room and emerged a few seconds later with his desk in his arms. The damaging blaze was attributed to faulty electrical wiring in the attic between the towers above the Senate chamber, although it was rumored that a legislator may have left a smoldering cigar after a late night meeting.

...

Contracts for repairs to the Senate wing of the State House were signed the next January. At first, it seemed that the square southeast tower would have to be torn down and rebuilt, because it had cracked with the heat of the fire. Upon further inspection, it was discovered that the method of installing the huge iron cupolas atop each tower was causing the structural damage. All the towers posed a serious threat to the building and to anything below them. They were all removed, thus saving the south tower and preventing further structural damage to the others. A contractor was paid to remove them and was allowed to keep any money he made by selling them as scrap iron. Public opinion was mixed on the appearance of the building without the towers Mark Twain had mocked.


Source: Louisiana's Old State Capitol by Carol K. Haase, pp. 53-54. Link: LINK

And in payment for my taking a chunk from her book, here is a link to the book on Amazon: LINK
This post was edited on 6/6/19 at 4:24 am
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
67051 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 5:59 am to
quote:

JohnnyKilroy


sad and pathetic
Posted by el mapache
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
183 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:06 am to
Perhaps some of you should spend a little more time learning history instead of accepting the narrative the libs have given to you. The war was not fought over the morality of slavery. Slavery was legal in the North & the South. Yes, there were in slaves in New York & Pennsylvania. While we all agree today that slavery was wrong, the war was started over economics & states' rights. The men that fought in the war did not own plantations or people. The statue in downtown BR was erected to honor local people who died in battle.....that's all.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27238 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:10 am to
I... assume that wasn’t actually directed at me...
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34433 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:13 am to
quote:

As if unable to thrive on good times, the State House sustained another blow that nearly destroyed it in 1906. On June 8, a fire of unknown origin broke out and severely damaged the Senate chamber.


frick yeah!

Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
12268 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:17 am to
Don’t explain logic. Doesn’t fit liberal agenda. Every time I see these threads I think of mitch the bitch who was one of the worst mayors ever. Even worse than moon and that’s saying much.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53181 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:19 am to
its really sad that all those men died just so gay people could get married


i guess that's all yankees care about
Posted by dawgsjw
Member since Dec 2012
2114 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:24 am to
How long before the state of Louisiana is 100% culcha? Maybe make Louisiana culcha capitol of the world and just have all of them flock over there, so the rest of the states can be culcha free. Isn't that what they want? To have a state to their own so they can show the world how much money they can generate through fiscally sound practices implemented in such a way that the rest of the world (and universe) will be totally jelly of?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53181 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:29 am to
The war was actually fought so that yankees could take southerners states rights away

That’s why we have to bake gay wedding cakes now. Lincoln was the first gay president long before Obama
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:30 am to
quote:

the war was started over economics & states' rights


Right. The states' right to own slaves.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53181 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:38 am to
a lot of white people would work in the fields beside their helpers and they were like members of the family like in that movie the revenant

In the north they made their slaves do hard jobs like dig coal and shite, which is why the north is still so racist today

The yankee liberals knew that if they could make the south divided along racial lines instead of best friends they could truly break us and they’ve been doing it ever since


ETA: I bet you drive a Prius
This post was edited on 6/6/19 at 6:39 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:41 am to
quote:

el Gaucho



You're so up and down with your trolling. In some threads, you're great. In others, you aren't so good.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43309 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:50 am to
quote:

war was started over economics & states' rights.


Both of which were heavily, heavily influenced by slavery. The Confederate states wanted the right to keep slaves.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53181 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:52 am to
Wrong. The south’s economy was based on cotton. What are they teaching you millennials these days?
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20729 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 6:57 am to
copied this from a comment on the civil war. This person knows their history!
Abraham Lincoln repeatedly stated his war was caused by taxes only, and not by slavery, at all.
"My policy sought only to collect the Revenue (a 40 percent federal sales tax on imports to Southern States under the Morrill Tariff Act of 1861)." reads paragraph 5 of Lincoln's First Message to the U.S. Congress, penned July 4, 1861.
"I have no purpose, directly or in-directly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so," Lincoln said it his first inaugural on March 4 of the same year.
There is no proof of Lincoln ever declaring the war was fought to abolish slavery, and without such an official statement, the war-over-slavery teaching remains a complete lie and offensive hate speech that divides Americans, as is being done now by the media and politicians regarding the Confederate flag in South Carolina.
Slavery was NOT abolished; just the name was changed to sharecropper with over 5 million Southern whites and 3 million Southern blacks working on land stolen by Wall Street bankers.
White, black, Indian, Hispanic, Protestant, Catholic and Jewish Confederates valiantly stood as one in thousands of battles on land and sea. Afterwards, they attended Confederate Veterans' reunions together and received pensions from Southern States.
Photos of black Confederate veterans may be seen in Alabama's Archives in Scrapbook - 41st Reunion of United Confederate Veterans, Montgomery, June 2,3,4 and 5, 1931."
Lincoln did not claim slavery was a reason even in his Emancipation Proclamations on Sept. 22, 1862, and Jan. 1, 1863. Moreover, Lincoln's proclamations exempted a million slaves under his control from being freed (including General U.S. Grant's four slaves) and offered the South three months to return to the Union (pay 40 percent sales tax) and keep their slaves. None did. Lincoln affirmed his only reason for issuing was: "as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said (tax) rebellion."
Mrs. Grant wrote in her personal memoirs: "We rented our pretty little home (in St. Louis) and hired out our four servants to persons whom we knew and who promised to be kind to them. Eliza, Dan, Julia and John belonged to me. When I visited the General during the War, I nearly always had Julia with me as nurse."
Lincoln declared war to collect taxes in his two presidential war proclamations against the Confederate States, on April 15 and 19th, 1861: "Whereas an insurrection against the Government of the United States has broken out and the laws of the United States for the collection of the revenue cannot be effectually executed therein."
On Dec. 25, 1860, South Carolina declared unfair taxes to be a cause of secession: "The people of the Southern States are not only taxed for the benefit of the Northern States, but after the taxes are collected, three-fourths (75%) of them are expended at the North (to subsidize Wall Street industries that elected Lincoln)." (Paragraphs 5-8)
It was on April 8, 1861, that Lincoln, alone, started the war by a surprise attack on Charleston Harbor with a fleet of warships, led by the USS Harriet Lane, to occupy Fort Sumter, a Federal tax collection fort in the territorial waters of South Carolina and then invaded Virginia.
On April 29, 1861, President Jefferson Davis described the South's response of self-defense in his Message To the Confederate States Congress: "I directed a proposal to be made to the commander of Fort Sumter that we would abstain from directing our fire on Fort Sumter if he would promise not to open fire on our forces unless first attacked. This proposal was refused." (Paragraphs 8-9)
The only reason the South ever gave for fighting was in self-defense of the voluntary Union of independent States, as symbolized then by the U.S. Flag.
Secession (withdrawal from a voluntary union) and war are two very different events!
Posted by whoa
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
4638 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 7:02 am to
quote:

Just like in New Orleans, removing the confederate monument had done nothing to slow down violent crime in BR

The fact that people cling to this narrative is hilarious. One has nothing to do with the other.

The statue is housed where it should be...a museum.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 7:08 am to
quote:

On Dec. 25, 1860, South Carolina declared unfair taxes to be a cause of secession


quote:

We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.

For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the forms of the Constitution, a sectional party has found within that Article establishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.

-Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27173 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 7:41 am to
Or look at Mississippi's secession declaration:

quote:

In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.


Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 7:44 am to
Or Texas

quote:

In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, based upon the unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of the equality of all men, irrespective of race or color--a doctrine at war with nature, in opposition to the experience of mankind, and in violation of the plainest revelations of the Divine Law. They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and the negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39741 posts
Posted on 6/6/19 at 7:47 am to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram