- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Walgreens pharmacist denies pregnant woman miscarriage medication over his ethical beliefs
Posted on 6/25/18 at 7:59 am to lsunurse
Posted on 6/25/18 at 7:59 am to lsunurse
I'm just trying to understand what beliefs he could have to deny her the medicine, especially after she most certainly explained the situation to him
2
Posted on 6/25/18 at 8:05 am to Salmon
quote:
especially after she most certainly explained the situation to him
I'm sure by that point he had already made up his mind. Some people will never admit they are wrong and trying to do so will only strengthen their opposition (*cough* lnchbox)
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 8:06 am
Posted on 6/25/18 at 8:05 am to Salmon
quote:
I'm just trying to understand what beliefs he could have to deny her the medicine, especially after she most certainly explained the situation to him
There is some pretty crazy beliefs out there. At least in my opinion. I know that some believe that for a completely unviable ectopic (tubular) pregnancy, it is perfectly fine to remove the tube and terminate the pregnancy, but to take a medicine to directly pass the pregnancy is morally wrong. Because by removing the tube, you aren't directly terminating the pregnancy, it's just a by-product. But a by-product that was the sole intention of the procedure.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News