Started By
Message

re: Since the topic of Coach O being a good coach won't go away, I'll throw in my 2 cents

Posted on 10/20/17 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by alumni95
Member since Jun 2004
7587 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

And for the money, and what other coaches were asking for, I think it was the right business move... with a short leash.


There are 12 million reasons that disagree with that statement.

And if we had to pony up for the highest paid OC/DC tandem, was it STILL a good business move?
This post was edited on 10/20/17 at 12:11 pm
Posted by cra_cra
Member since Nov 2016
1743 posts
Posted on 10/20/17 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

There are 12 million reasons that disagree with that statement.

And if we had to pony up for the highest paid OC/DC tandem, was it STILL a good business move?


Yes, it is.

1. The buyout significantly drops in year 2 and year 3. It is highly unlikely any head coach at a major university is going to be fired after 1 year.

2. When you factor the buyout with what you are paying him, and then compare that to what you would have spent on a new coach (5-7 million) plus his buyout, you still likely end up better off.

3. Furthermore, even though we are paying our coordinators well, a new head coach would have still required strong coordinators themselves. So that really is a wash (considering their pay). At worst, maybe you save 500k a year between the 2.

4. And factoring in we are still paying Miles, and then what we have to pay O, it's a big win.


So, IMO, LSU made the best business move it could. If O wins 9 games this year and next (essentially equalling what Miles did his last 2 years), LSU wins big time.

And as I have stated for months, I think LSU will be a 9 win team this year and next and should trend up after that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram