- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT's ISIS expert: ISIS likely behind LV attack.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:04 am to MrCarton
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:04 am to MrCarton
I'd also like to point out that ISIL doesn't have membership cards. Only requirement to be in ISIL is to claim it. So even that criteria is too broad and that totally explains how she can make her claim of 47/50.
If an terrorist has no actual connection with ISIS, then they've exhibited no control over his operation. Meaning their claims to credit for the attack are extremely strained.
We would never agree to this standard for other situations. Just terrorism.
If an terrorist has no actual connection with ISIS, then they've exhibited no control over his operation. Meaning their claims to credit for the attack are extremely strained.
We would never agree to this standard for other situations. Just terrorism.
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 2:07 am
2
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:08 am to MrCarton
If she is a hot shite journo, then she should publish the actual links between the terrorst and the actual ISIS organization for all to see.
We will likely never see that, because the numbers wouldn't be impressive.
We will likely never see that, because the numbers wouldn't be impressive.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:14 am to MrCarton
I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Let's say group B is doing X due to stated reason Y. Let's say individual C starts to agree with group B and their stated reason Y, and therefore does X.
B never directly contacted individual C. Were they
1. Responsible
2. The impetus
3. An inspiration
4. Other
5. Nothing
If 1-3, could they claim credit for individual C doing X?
B never directly contacted individual C. Were they
1. Responsible
2. The impetus
3. An inspiration
4. Other
5. Nothing
If 1-3, could they claim credit for individual C doing X?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News