Started By
Message

Any offensive discussion without this being the #1 talking point is meaningless.

Posted on 9/19/17 at 11:43 am
Posted by Damseyrarrar
Bunche Village
Member since Oct 2016
377 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 11:43 am
Not like this hasn't been discussed, but very little when compared to all the other alleged issues. It's just not the low hanging fruit that's easy to scream about for the "fire everyone" crew.

We're so weak & ineffective on the O Line. Blown up all night long Sat. Nothing else matters.

No offense has any success without a strong O Line unless the entire offensive scheme is based on working around it (spread, option, quick game, etc). Let us run that offense and see the melt here when we can't put a game away in the 4th quarter. The guys losing their shite then would still have no clue it would be all about the O Line.

We may not be in a rebuilding mode if all you look at are the skill positions. But, on the O Line? We're absolutely rebuilding and it's everything. Let's hope some continuity and some coaching allows us to see some of the things we looked forward to seeing from Canada's offense.

Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38245 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 11:45 am to
It's hard to do anything when their entire defense is only concerned with stopping Guice.
Posted by SwampBandit
Livonia, La
Member since Jun 2016
3403 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 11:55 am to
I agree, we definitely need to get in the shotgun and go four or five wide and hit some quick passes on mismatches and so on, Problem is is Etling still shows signs of inaccuracy on short routes and our receivers also drop the passes that he does put on target. Our d line and O line need to be heavily recruited for next year for sure.... I do think we should see what Brennan can do during these next couple weeks because if Etling stays inconsistent then we need a different plan....Key needs to run all practice and get back to his fighting weight because he looks like jello on the field, assignments need to be drilled into the defenses head on containing and so on, if you cause a penalty you should get pulled for at least a series which would hurt because we have no depth on O line and D line. Canada needs to figure out some new schemes because that whole only running 10% of the playbook seems to be BS.... There is a lot to be done and we need some major recruiting done for next years class!!!!!
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 11:57 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95925 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

We're so weak & ineffective on the O Line. Blown up all night long Sat. Nothing else matters.

Except we werent. Only 8 pressures on 22 dropbacks correct?


Yall need to go watch how bad other lines are in pass blocking at the college level
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 11:56 am
Posted by PeaRidgeWatash
Down by the docks of the city
Member since Dec 2004
15210 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 12:05 pm to
Yep
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79935 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 12:11 pm to
When you lose by 30 pts, it's a safe bet you got dominated on BOTH sides of the LOS.
Posted by higgins
flowery branch, ga
Member since Dec 2009
7918 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 1:00 pm to
"man, think about all those screens we'll run to Guice"- the entire rant all summer of 2017.

neutralize a pass rush with screen passes? HELL NO! WE'LL JUST RUN EVRYfrickINBODY IN PRE SNAP MOTION. that'll fool em.
Posted by km
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5653 posts
Posted on 9/19/17 at 1:03 pm to
I think Canada needs to tweak the offense to account for the team speed of SEC defenses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram