Started By
Message

re: "Russian hack" of DNC happened July 2015, before Trump announced his presidential campaign

Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:59 am to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:59 am to
quote:

How do you feel about the way Hillary and the DNC dealt with cybersecurity protections, threats, and the subsequent investigation?
I don't give a wooden nickel about what Hillary's campaign did to protect a bunch of unclassified campaign-related communications. They were inept. But the Clinton campaign's poor cyber-security is not the subject of this investigation. It neither excuses the actions of foreign actors who sought to interfere nor those of any potential colluders on our side.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147360 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:03 am to
Russia paying HRC back for election interference had nothing to do with Trump. True or False?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 11:14 am to
quote:

It neither excuses the actions of foreign actors who sought to interfere nor those of any potential colluders on our side.


Don't try to change the subject

This entire witch hunt started because the media said trump was colluding with Russians because Putin hacked the DNC to help Trump

Trump hasn't even announced he was running for president yet

You clown
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12421 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

unclassified campaign-related communication


Liar.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124188 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

to protect a bunch of unclassified campaign-related communications.
Three observations:
(a) SAP material on Clinton's Private Server was not unclassified.
(b) Material on the DNC Server was deemed valuable enough to allow Russians to """hack""" our election.
(c) Individuals responsible for a and b are, or would be, responsible for maintenance of security throughout government.
quote:

It neither excuses the actions of foreign actors who sought to interfere
Odd language coming from you.

Does one EVER ""excuse"" espionage?
In fact do those of you in the field EVER assume espionage will NOT be attempted?

Of course not!

We can slap the hand of those countries who attempt it. But our major impact is through anticipation, interdiction, and other prevention of effective espionage.

Yet you "don't give a wooden nickel about" it. I'll bet you do. If not, you should.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram