Started By
Message

re: Slavery was not the only issue the South was fighting for

Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12120 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Not surprising considering 49% of Missisppi Households owned slaves in 1860. Loved their precious slaves.
That is a misapplication of statistics. At its height, according to the census, there were slightly less than 31k slave owners in Mississippi. The total free population of the State was a little over 351k.

Furthermore, you can whine about slaves all you want, but it was really about money (could have just as easily have been about tractors were it in today's era). Most plantations has more capital in the slaves than they did in anything else, and that capital was being unduly burdened by a Northern government which received the majority of outlays while the South maintained nearly 2/3rd of the nation's wealth.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
817 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Furthermore, you can whine about slaves all you want, but it was really about money (could have just as easily have been about tractors were it in today's era). 


And yet Michael Vick was jailed for running a dog fighting ring essentially as a way to engage in commerce. Those dogs could have easily been tractors. Food for thought.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72724 posts
Posted on 8/20/17 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

At its height, according to the census, there were slightly less than 31k slave owners in Mississippi. The total free population of the State was a little over 351k.


And 436,631 slaves. Not owning them doesn't mean they were not complicit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram