Started By
Message

re: Dunkirk discussion (NO SPOILERS)

Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:22 am to
Posted by hehateme
Tallahassee
Member since Oct 2003
785 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:22 am to
I feel like "lack of character development" is the standard excuse that unsophisticated movie-goers use to criticize a film to seem smart when they don't realize that not all films are "character" films.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:26 am to
It's hard to care about a movie if the characters are bad. I'm not saying they have to be incredibly deep or complex, but if they're so bland that you don't care if they live or die, that's a problem (Rouge One).
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20835 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I feel like "lack of character development" is the standard excuse that unsophisticated movie-goers use to criticize a film to seem smart when they don't realize that not all films are "character" films.



Oh, unquestionably.

That doesn't mean it's never true, but I agree with you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram