- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are there certain teams that should never contend for CFP or Natty?
Posted on 6/25/17 at 8:59 pm to GAAtty70
Posted on 6/25/17 at 8:59 pm to GAAtty70
The committee needs to go to the wayside. The BCS-era computers generally put the teams in the proper ranking order at the end of the year IMO.. with the expansion to 4 teams, by all means, let anyone in the top 4 compete for the championship.
2
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:05 pm to lesgeaux
quote:
The committee needs to go to the wayside. The BCS-era computers generally put the teams in the proper ranking order at the end of the year IMO.. with the expansion to 4 teams, by all means, let anyone in the top 4 compete for the championship.
This is what was proposed by Mike Slive in 08 but only the ACC commish supported it.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 9:12 pm to lesgeaux
quote:
The committee needs to go to the wayside. The BCS-era computers generally put the teams in the proper ranking order at the end of the year IMO.. with the expansion to 4 teams, by all means, let anyone in the top 4 compete for the championship.
that's what everyone wanted
I wouldn't be opposed to allowing computers to count MOV either, which I remember was not allowed because people were afraid of running up the scores.
Maybe cap the effects of the MOV in the mathematics such that any victory over some arbitrary amount (like 14 or 17 points) registers the same.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News