- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:04 pm to Lacour
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:04 pm to Lacour
quote:
The first one gets a lot of crap but I enjoyed it
It's not bad, it just would have been a LOT better staying closer to the source material, as opposed to the only thing in common with the book being the name.
Especially considering the original approach was closer, but the studio nixed it because it was considered too dark. Ever wondered why Micheal Fox was one of the helicopter rescuers and then disappears for the rest of the movie?
1
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:39 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Especially considering the original approach was closer, but the studio nixed it because it was considered too dark. Ever wondered why Micheal Fox was one of the helicopter rescuers and then disappears for the rest of the movie?
Explain this. How was the original idea different from what we got?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News