- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USA Today: We need a Robert Mueller resignation
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:23 am to RobbBobb
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:23 am to RobbBobb
Hmm, weird that USA Today, a MSM outlet published this.
I agree with them. I've been saying that POTUS should fire Mueller due to his connections to Comey & his Clinton-donor appointees to his Special Counsel team.
It reeks of partisanship.
I agree with them. I've been saying that POTUS should fire Mueller due to his connections to Comey & his Clinton-donor appointees to his Special Counsel team.
It reeks of partisanship.
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:37 am to 225bred
quote:How is it that this board is completely ignorant of the opinion section of a newspaper???
Hmm, weird that USA Today, a MSM outlet published this.
Have any of you even taken a high school level Poli Sci class?
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:37 am to 225bred
quote:
I agree with them. I've been saying that POTUS should fire Mueller due to his connections to Comey & his Clinton-donor appointees to his Special Counsel team.
So are you saying that Mueller should of vetted his appointees and made sure they didn't donate to Democrats?
How exactly does that work? Ask in the interview, "who did you donate to politically?" and tell them they can't get the job if they said anyone on the left?"
Does he then fire the people he appoints that he finds out donated to Democrats?
Why wouldn't people that donated to Republicans be a conflict as well?
Furthermore, should exercising your constitutional rights now disqualify you from public service?
This entire line of attack makes no sense. And that is before acknowledging that all the stuff I said is forbidden by a special counsel from asking in the hiring process. To establish this attack as being of consequence, we need some evidence that Mueller intentionally hired Democrat sympathizers with intent. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of that.
All from a guy that was appointed as a US Attorney by Reagan, Assistant Attorney General by George HW Bush, Deputy Attorney General by George W Bush, and then appointed FBI director by George W Bush by a vote of 98-0. Extended under Obama for several years as FBI director by 100-0 vote.
This post was edited on 6/20/17 at 1:44 am
Posted on 6/20/17 at 5:01 am to 225bred
quote:
Hmm, weird that USA Today, a MSM outlet published this.
Professor Reynolds regularly writes for USA Today. He's a staunch libertarian and runs my favorite website for news, Instapundit.
He calls out the bullshite on both sides of the isle.
Posted on 6/20/17 at 6:51 am to 225bred
quote:
weird that USA Today, a MSM outlet published this.
it kinda is, maybe they know that the plan won't work with Mueller and they decided to play a little 3D chess of their own
Posted on 6/20/17 at 9:42 am to 225bred
quote:
Hmm, weird that USA Today, a MSM outlet published this.
This board has a terrible misunderstanding of OpEds and opinion sections of news outlets.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News