Started By
Message

re: First human ancestors came from Europe not Africa 7.2 million-year-old fossils indicate

Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:10 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69358 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:10 pm to
The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35525 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


Was that desert even there back then? I know much of that area used to be good land.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states.


The Sahara desert as we know it today developed 2 to 3 million years ago. There is strong evidence the climate there was at the minimum semi-arid. Seeing as these fossils predate the desertification of that desert, it isn't relevant to this particular discovery.
Posted by Dave Worth
Metairie
Member since Dec 2003
1817 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:15 pm to
The Sahara wasn't always a desert like you know it today. There have been periods where it was lush and full of rain as late as 10,000 years ago.

I'm not saying people came from Africa, Europe or outer space. Just that millions of years ago the climate was very different in varied places.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


The desert formed about the same time as the first hominids developed.

And this story is very interesting but doesn't mean we can't trace our roots back to africa. Just b.c this hominid formed in greece region, doesn't mean that homo ergastor did.

source: Wife volunteers as evolution educator, although her speciality isn't hominids.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33950 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


They say it wasn't a desert back then, but rather a forest. Anyways, this evidence doesn't dispel the Out of Africa theory, it merely suggests that our ancestors were in Europe much sooner than previously thought. Big difference.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 5:19 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109076 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


That's because the Sahara Desert wasn't formed until about 7,000 years ago. Humans had long left Africa before then.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30955 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


Was it a desert that long ago?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


But they could cross it heading south?
Posted by Texas Weazel
Louisiana is a shithole
Member since Oct 2016
8546 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

They would have been cooked and died.

You'd be surprised at how well our ancestors were able to adapt and thrive in different environments.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67210 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 6:04 pm to
The Sahara was not desert until fairly recently geologically. It was grassland during the last ice age and for a while afterwards. Desertification did not become widespread until the early Egyptian civilizations had begun building mud brick mastabas. In fact, there was still enough water to traverse the Sahara on horseback as recent as the Roman wars with Carthage.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.


1. the article is about beings that lived 7 million years ago.
nothing you would call human lived until a few hundred thousand years ago, probaby not even that. Neanderthals and the Denisovans were afoot.
if you look at the research closely, you do not see what you would call humans, several hundred thousand years ago. 1/3rd sized brains, for instance.
there were MANY hominids.
2. as for your climate issue, climate changed many times over the millions of years, as cycles like the movement of the Milky way, and within our galaxy changed too. Sun around the galaxy every 26,000, right?
the saraha probably did not appear until recently.




This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 6:31 pm
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8020 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.



Besides the aforementioned relatively recent desertification of the Sahara, there is far too much genetic diversity within sub-Saharan vis a vis the rest of the world to make anyone seriously think otherwise. The amount of genetic diversity within sub-Saharan Africa is exponentially larger than it is even between the rest of the world.

Plus, all of our closest meaningful genetic relatives are in Africa. That's pretty compelling all on its own.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 10:21 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram