Started By
Message

re: You got what you wanted--NPR did a story on Seth Rich

Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:01 am to
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82335 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:01 am to
How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 7:02 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35476 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?
What evidence? Assange never said anything, just acted like a little bitch.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124220 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:05 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly?
FWIW, their characterization of Assange's comments regarding Seth Rich are spot on.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72853 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:06 am to
quote:

He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?




Well, no, he doesn't.
Posted by UHTiger
Member since Jan 2007
5231 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 7:11 am to
No he doesn't. Especially when he is noncommital. It's not testimony or evidence or anything

This whole stupid theory is a Nothing burger
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30969 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 8:35 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?


Wikileaks has a policy to NEVER divulge a source, even after death.

So Assange has never actually confirmed that he received anything from Seth Rich. So it doesn't count as "evidence" when he doesn't confirm anything.

Here's the text from his tweet:

Julian Assange @JulianAssange
WikiLeaks has never disclosed a source. Sources sometimes talk to other parties but identities never emerge from WikiLeaks. #SethRich
2:08 AM - 22 May 2017
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79337 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 10:24 am to
quote:

How can the author (Ari Shapiro) dismiss Julian Assange so arrogantly? He doesn't qualify as "evidence"?



It's arrogant to say that Assange is fricking with people?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram