- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Chandler Parsons--How did this guy ever warrant $22,116,750/yr???
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:33 pm
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:33 pm
Parsons has nothing in his game that ever hinted he could be a marquee player. He's a 13 pt/gm guy. I know Cuban liked the kid, but surely business is business as he smartly let him depart to Memphis. But what did Memphis see in this cat???
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:36 pm to radicalizedtigah
Teams in the NBA need to accept that they either can or can't win the conference. Signing free agents is done only to sell jerseys/tickets.
The Spurs signing Aldridge is great, but they aren't beating the Cavs and Warriors in the same postseason because of his addition.
The Spurs signing Aldridge is great, but they aren't beating the Cavs and Warriors in the same postseason because of his addition.
This post was edited on 5/20/17 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:38 pm to radicalizedtigah
Paying for a guy who they thought would be a stud.
Considering his 2 years in Dallas (and some of his time in Houston) were injury riddled... It was a horrible decision. Worse than that of Dell Demps paying max for Gordon.
Considering his 2 years in Dallas (and some of his time in Houston) were injury riddled... It was a horrible decision. Worse than that of Dell Demps paying max for Gordon.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:44 pm to radicalizedtigah
So glad the Rockets didn't get tied to Bosh and Parsons during that offseason, which would've been seen as a huge win at the time but was instead seen as a huge loss. Crazy how things can pan out.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 8:59 pm to radicalizedtigah
He's had some serious knee problems the past several years. He's had several surgeries I believe.
He was a good player and only getting better but the injuries really destroyed his game.
When he was with the Rockets, there were legitimate arguments as to who was the better player, Chandler Parsons or Kawhi Leonard. That sounds silly now, but they were both improving at similar rates until Parsons had career-altering injuries.
He was a good player and only getting better but the injuries really destroyed his game.
When he was with the Rockets, there were legitimate arguments as to who was the better player, Chandler Parsons or Kawhi Leonard. That sounds silly now, but they were both improving at similar rates until Parsons had career-altering injuries.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 9:01 pm to radicalizedtigah
A few things--
$22M is not a marquee rate. That's a 2nd option rate in the modern NBA, under the new CBA. Its taking a little while for him to fall back out of the Top 15 in salary, but he's likely to slide into the 20s or 30s this year, and even farther beyond it, if he plays to the end of this contract.
What they saw, was a guy who was a 15-16 point a game scorer when healthy, who could give you 30 productive minutes without killing you defensively, and who was entering his age prime.
Parsons has yet to recover fully to be the player he was, or the player his first five or so seasons indicated he might become. It is extremely unlikely he ever will- but this isn't a huge huge reach, salary structure wise. Its just a medium risk bet that didn't pan out.
$22M is not a marquee rate. That's a 2nd option rate in the modern NBA, under the new CBA. Its taking a little while for him to fall back out of the Top 15 in salary, but he's likely to slide into the 20s or 30s this year, and even farther beyond it, if he plays to the end of this contract.
What they saw, was a guy who was a 15-16 point a game scorer when healthy, who could give you 30 productive minutes without killing you defensively, and who was entering his age prime.
Parsons has yet to recover fully to be the player he was, or the player his first five or so seasons indicated he might become. It is extremely unlikely he ever will- but this isn't a huge huge reach, salary structure wise. Its just a medium risk bet that didn't pan out.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 11:17 pm to radicalizedtigah
when the cap goes up like it has, you have to give bad contracts out.
NFL players were crying about the horrible, huge deals, 7th men,8th men were getting, because teams had to get to the cap floor.
NFL players were crying about the horrible, huge deals, 7th men,8th men were getting, because teams had to get to the cap floor.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 1:43 am to radicalizedtigah
It was a bad FA year if I remember correctly and quite a few teams were looking for that one player or SF that would put them over. Mavericks overpaid thinking he was someone they could build around.
Posted on 5/21/17 at 6:48 am to radicalizedtigah
At least that $22 million/year is getting him this:
Posted on 5/21/17 at 7:35 am to radicalizedtigah
It's a little high, but he is a 16-18 million when healthy.
There aren't enough top line players to cover $3 billion in salary a year.
There aren't enough top line players to cover $3 billion in salary a year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News