- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Harvard study: 98% of MSM coverage of Trump negative
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:01 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:01 am
LINK
Worse than North Korea
quote:
Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets.
It found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations:
quote:
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.
Every outlet was negative more often than positive.
quote:
The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 got positive good overall – with 59% of reports positive.
Worse than North Korea
18
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:02 am to bamarep
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:03 am to bamarep
Trump has had a horrible time in office so far, including a personal press briefing where he just lashed out at the press.
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
Not sure how you spin an fbi investigation in a positive way.
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 8:05 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:03 am to bamarep
Rules for Radicals. Media is controlled by leftist radicals.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:11 am to bamarep
some pretty interesting notes in that study
like this for example
this just illustrates that the media doesn't have to spin things, Trump does this to himself
also with as much as this board bitches about the "muh Russians", it only receiving 6% of the news coverage is surprising
like this for example
this just illustrates that the media doesn't have to spin things, Trump does this to himself
also with as much as this board bitches about the "muh Russians", it only receiving 6% of the news coverage is surprising
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:11 am to bamarep
You reap what you sow.
Actions and tweets have consequences.
Actions and tweets have consequences.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:22 am to bamarep
There's no question the media has been after Trump from the jump. I actually really bothers me that he was never going to be given a chance.
That being said, Trump also brought at least 25% of that coverage on himself by acting like a damn goon.
That being said, Trump also brought at least 25% of that coverage on himself by acting like a damn goon.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:53 am to bamarep
Without Fox there wouldn't be the 2%!
MSM always hating on repubs.
Libtards always saying they deserve it.
Nothing new under the sun.
MSM always hating on repubs.
Libtards always saying they deserve it.
Nothing new under the sun.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:08 am to bamarep
It's not surprising the regressives here are too dishonest to admit the MSM hates Trump.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:26 am to bamarep
quote:
Worse than North Korea
Shut the frick up.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:31 am to bamarep
I don't doubt it. The MSM has made their mission to torpedo Trump. They control the message in what they report as well as how they report it. It doesn't matter what Trump does, it will be spun negatively if it's reported at all. His bad actions will get days of coverage and his good ones will not get hardly a mention.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:36 am to bamarep
Yeah, it's like having a million AuggieDub's out in the world. Pansy arse lefties that only want to tear away at everything because their buttholes are still bruised and bleeding from election night.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:47 am to bamarep
What is happening is a left wing media coup.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:36 am to bamarep
I said it shortly after the election that I never thought I'd see the day where Fox News is without question the fairest and most balanced news network on television.
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 10:37 am
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:50 am to bamarep
quote:
Fox News
quote:
Every outlet was negative more often than positive
But, but, but, but...
Posted on 5/19/17 at 11:04 am to bamarep
quote:
Harvard study: 98% of MSM coverage of Trump negative
Part of the problem with political discourse today is people think that coverage of all sides and all candidates should be close to 50% positive and 50% negative. Trump's presidency has been one frick up after another. The fact that the coverage has been overwhelmingly negative reflects reality.
When news networks go out of their way to produce positive content about a candidate because they want to APPEAR unbiased, that IS bias.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 10:45 pm to bamarep
Kind of a chicken/egg scenario isn't it? Dude's a frick up.
Posted on 5/20/17 at 12:06 am to bamarep
What has MSM covered that was positive for Trump? The firing of Comey? 
Posted on 5/20/17 at 12:11 am to bamarep
quote:
In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.
They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.
And water is wet.
I mean besides Fox...it's all Hill camp kool-aiders.
Uk is fricking gone to hell...and Germany?
Merkel no likey? Go figure. Her BFF got defeated in the US elections.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News